LGTM1 assuming there aren't any surprises on that front. Thanks!!

On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 2:33 PM Dominik Röttsches <dr...@google.com> wrote:

> Hi Yoav,
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 6:46 PM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8922#issuecomment-1720930646
>> indicates that some parts of this were resolved and other parts are still
>> to be bikeshedded.
>>
>> Can you expand on that? What's the issue around color space interpolation?
>>
>
> In my response further down in the thread I untangled that
> <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8922#issuecomment-1792237695>.
> There are two situations in which we need an explicit color space
> representation:
> 1) In mixing two palettes, to describe it as a static state, when an
> animation or transition has completed or when we're describing an interim
> state of an animation or transition. For this, we need an explicit
> interpolation method in the grammar of palette-mix() - to be consistent
> with color-mix() and to prepare to capture a static interpolation value
> when animations will have color space control, see below.
> The "remaining bike shedding to be done" that's captured in the notes
> solely originated from a question from emilio@ on whether that color
> interpolation tag is needed. Munira and I discussed that with him in the
> directly follow break at resolution at TPAC - but that was offline and not
> minuted. I am expecting emilio@ to comment on this - otherwise there was
> nothing open.
>
> 2) What needs to be discussed as a wider issue in CSS is controlling the
> interpolation method during animation or transitions, but that's outside
> the scope of the issue we resolved on. Interpolation color space control
> during animations and transitions are discussed in #7741
> <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7741> and #7063
> <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7063>.
>
> I'll ping Emilio again to comment on the issue. Assuming that happens, I
> really see no blockers at all, and Chris Lilley seems to agree with us on
> that.
>
> Dominik
>
>
>>
>> On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 4:02:34 PM UTC+1 moo...@google.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Submitted:
>>>
>>>    - TAG review: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/915
>>>    - Requested signals from the other vendors:
>>>    - Gecko: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/925
>>>       - Webkit: https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/276
>>>
>>> Thank you, Daniel!
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 4:52 PM Daniel Bratell <bratel...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, could you please request signals from the other vendors?
>>>> https://bit.ly/blink-signals will tell you how they work.
>>>>
>>>> Also, you may want to file a TAG review, or give them a FYI or let us
>>>> know why that is not necessary.
>>>>
>>>> /Daniel
>>>> On 2023-11-08 13:56, 'Munira Tursunova' via blink-dev wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Contact emails moon...@google.com, dr...@google.com
>>>>
>>>> Explainer
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XMTrKH003KBOes6hxzI-3E7LTwp5YwFC-rnzoFpFrfw/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>>> Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-4/#font-palette-prop
>>>>
>>>> Summary
>>>>
>>>> The CSS font-palette property allows selection of a specific palette
>>>> used to render a font. The CSS Fonts 4 spec defines the animation behavior
>>>> of this property as discrete, which is insufficient to achieve a smooth
>>>> transition between two selected palettes. Instead, animating the
>>>> font-palette property should happen by interpolating each of the colour
>>>> record values from the defined palette, i.e. if the start or the end of the
>>>> animation has a different colour value for some record in the palette, such
>>>> colour value should be interpolated.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blink component Blink>Fonts
>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EFonts>
>>>>
>>>> Search tags font-palette
>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:font-palette>, animation
>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:animation>, transition
>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:transition>,
>>>> font-palette-values
>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:font-palette-values>, color
>>>> fonts <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:color%20fonts>
>>>>
>>>> TAG review None
>>>>
>>>> TAG review status Not applicable
>>>>
>>>> Risks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>
>>>> Low, new feature, was resolved by W3C working group
>>>> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8922#issuecomment-1720930646,
>>>> but not yet implemented in other browsers.
>>>>
>>>> *Gecko*: No signal Not implemented.
>>>>
>>>> *WebKit*: No signal Not implemented.
>>>>
>>>> *Web developers*: Positive (
>>>> https://css-tricks.com/colrv1-and-css-font-palette-web-typography/#:~:text=Another%20limitation%3A%20animations%20and%20transitions%20from%20one%20font%2Dpalette%20to%20another%20don%E2%80%99t%20interpolate%20%E2%80%94%20meaning%20you%20can%20switch%20instantly%20from%20one%20palette%20to%20another%2C%20but%20can%E2%80%99t%20gradually%20animate%20between%20them.%20My%20dream%20of%20a%20luridly%20animated%20emoji%20font%20is%20sadly%20unrealized)
>>>> Ollie Williams expressed his interest in the feature in his article on CSS
>>>> Tricks. Scott Kellum (of typetura.com) has also been suggesting it as
>>>> a useful feature for the web (origin: a Twitter thread and email
>>>> conversation, Scott in the meantime deleted their Twitter account).
>>>>
>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>
>>>> WebView application risks
>>>>
>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>
>>>> None
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Debuggability
>>>>
>>>> Same as any other CSS property, font-palette property is inspectable in
>>>> DevTools.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>> Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)? Yes
>>>>
>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>> ? Yes
>>>>
>>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-fonts/palette-mix-computed.html
>>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-fonts/animations/font-palette-interpolation.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Flag name on chrome://flags FontPaletteAnimation
>>>>
>>>> Finch feature name None
>>>>
>>>> Non-finch justification None
>>>>
>>>> Requires code in //chrome? False
>>>>
>>>> Tracking bug
>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1400620
>>>>
>>>> Sample links
>>>> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-4/images/nabla-animated.webp
>>>>
>>>> Estimated milestones
>>>> Shipping on desktop 121
>>>> DevTrial on desktop 119
>>>> Shipping on Android 121
>>>> DevTrial on Android 119
>>>> Shipping on WebView 121
>>>>
>>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>>
>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of
>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>> None
>>>>
>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5177171439517696
>>>>
>>>> Links to previous Intent discussions Intent to prototype:
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAO7W_DFvgY9yqz_Tr%2B2sHMwsydbWMQ66yZWwF7ZoxDZ2yE1QA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAO7W_Bao93XoyHRT6NKG6p4pP87pQ0bvTedXOiGc_2hX3E7Jw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAO7W_Bao93XoyHRT6NKG6p4pP87pQ0bvTedXOiGc_2hX3E7Jw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/85a8ff9f-03e2-4434-bc29-f7d02130e8e3n%40chromium.org
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/85a8ff9f-03e2-4434-bc29-f7d02130e8e3n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfU%3DKmysPKGBfykEE7Kv1g%3D9tO8bEq87Tfaw9knb9-uAZg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to