On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 6:10 PM Shu-yu Guo <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 9:03 AM Philip Jägenstedt <foo...@chromium.org> > wrote: > >> LGTM2 for Mike's plan of deprecating for 3 milestones, doing outreach, >> and then revisiting this thread. >> >> If we still know of serious breakage after this, is it an option to >> simply support both keywords indefinitely, but treat `assert` as legacy? >> Documentation, linters and autoformatters could all direct developers to >> `with`, without breaking any existing sites. >> > > Yes, it is an option to support both keywords indefinitely and treat > `assert` as legacy. TC39 consensus includes `assert` legacy support, on > account of Chrome having shipped in good faith. We're trying to remove it > for maximal interop since no other browsers shipped `assert`, but if it's > not feasible it will not be a willful violation of spec to continue > shipping it. > I see, thank you for clarifying. Looking forward to seeing what the deprecation and outreach result in. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAARdPYetzaKxSi_yWTCHd4xJrLh1OAY4YQBdwEN1cHd22kUnoA%40mail.gmail.com.
