M120 was released about 2 weeks ago, I checked data from Stable.
We don't see any spike on Stable, it's not a zero count but incompatible
cases are less than 0.0001% of the entire URL pattern creations, as we
expected.

If API owners agree, I believe we can go with PSA.
You can check the raw data with
Blink.URLPattern.IncompatiblePatternWithUnicodeSetsMode in the UMA
dashboard.

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 3:10 AM Mike Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 11/16/23 11:22 AM, Jeremy Roman wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 1:26 AM Mathias Bynens <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> In case helpful: the earlier i2s for html-pattern-v has some compat data
>> on the specific case of upgrading the HTML `pattern` attribute from the `u`
>> to the `v` flag:
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/gIyvMw0n2qw/m/3XaP6hFpAgAJ
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 5:55 AM Shunya Shishido <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We can wait for more data from the upcoming M120 stable for more
>>> confidence, but in that case we need an Intent to Ship instead of this PSA?
>>> As Jeremy mentioned the actual usage is nearly zero, so I believe this
>>> change very unlikely breaks sites.
>>>
>> That would be good. In the case where usage shot up more than we were
> expecting, or are comfortable with, then yes, an I2S would be required.
>
> Also worth noting this feature is Finchable, so in the unlikely event we
> see a spike in this in stable, we can Finch it off to reconsider before
> enabling this by default hits the stable channel.
>
> Gotcha.
>
>
>
>> "Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms" I see the
>>>> answer is no. Which platforms are not going to be supported?
>>>
>>> Let me correct, the answer is yes. I also updated the chromestatus
>>> entry.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 2:44 AM Jeremy Roman <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The "less than 0.001%" number is not a fraction of page loads, but of
>>>> URL patterns created -- so it's a minuscule fraction *of pages that
>>>> are using URLPattern at all* (which itself is 0.11%); if you look
>>>> up Blink.URLPattern.IncompatiblePatternWithUnicodeSetsMode in UMA you'll
>>>> see the raw data, but it truly is essentially zero samples.
>>>>
>>>> Most of the characters that would be invalid without escaping aren't as
>>>> common in URLs without percent encoding, the major exception being -,
>>>> because something like /[-a-z]/u works but /[-a-z]/v doesn't and the author
>>>> must write /[\-a-z]/v.
>>>>
>>>> (I'll leave it to Shunya to comment on the pros/cons of waiting for
>>>> stable data.)
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 11:04 AM Mike Taylor <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This feels like something that has the potential to be rather
>>>>> thorny... I would expect 0.001% on Beta to be higher on Stable.
>>>>>
>>>>> Given that your UMA
>>>>> <https://chromiumdash.appspot.com/commit/155a6cac4aab72685cfcc39029739394243ed1ef>
>>>>> landed in M120, could we wait a few weeks to look at the stable data, then
>>>>> come back with an Intent to Ship? This seems slightly riskier for a page
>>>>> than
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/gIyvMw0n2qw/m/-WZC9C4VCQAJ
>>>>> (which had server-side validation as a fallback).
>>>>> On 11/15/23 3:16 AM, Shunya Shishido wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Contact emails [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> Specification https://urlpattern.spec.whatwg.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Summary
>>>>>
>>>>> The URL Pattern API allows developers to specify pattern strings.
>>>>> Those are transformed to regular expressions internally. When the API was
>>>>> first implemented, these regular expressions were compiled with the u 
>>>>> flag.
>>>>> We're going to update it to the v flag, enabling Unicode sets
>>>>> <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/RegExp/unicodeSets>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Blink component Blink>URLPattern
>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EURLPattern>
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG review None
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG review status Not applicable
>>>>>
>>>>> Risks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/tc39/proposal-regexp-v-flag#how-is-the-v-flag-different-from-the-u-flag
>>>>> This doc has a list the potentially breaking changes between u and v. Some
>>>>> patterns that previously would compile, now throw an error with the v 
>>>>> flag,
>>>>> specifically those with a character class including either an unescaped
>>>>> special character or a double punctuator. I believe it does not
>>>>> significantly affect the patterns in use today. From UMA metric on Beta,
>>>>> incompatible patterns are less than 0.001% of the total compilation. Also,
>>>>> the use counter of the API itself has only 0.11%. The expected impact is
>>>>> extremely limited.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Gecko*: No signal
>>>>>
>>>>> *WebKit*: No signal
>>>>>
>>>>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>>>>
>>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>>
>>>>> WebView application risks
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>>
>>>>> None
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Debuggability
>>>>>
>>>>> None
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>>> Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)? No
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>> ? Yes
>>>>>
>>>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/urlpattern/urlpattern.any.html Tests for set
>>>>> notations were added in
>>>>> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/43014
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Flag name on chrome://flags
>>>>>
>>>>> Finch feature name URLPatternRegexpUnicodeSetsMode
>>>>>
>>>>> Requires code in //chrome? False
>>>>>
>>>>> Tracking bug
>>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1482263
>>>>>
>>>>> Estimated milestones
>>>>> Shipping on desktop 121
>>>>> Shipping on Android 121
>>>>>
>>>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>>>
>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>>>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>>>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>>> of
>>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>>> None
>>>>>
>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5122651463090176
>>>>>
>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGMyg-ZAnsDEw1haRd1HOuYcieHOYKZ73oYAQ3SfWv9umsd-TA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGMyg-ZAnsDEw1haRd1HOuYcieHOYKZ73oYAQ3SfWv9umsd-TA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/c16d70b8-298a-4dc7-80cf-1c1c2ae5c8ab%40chromium.org
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/c16d70b8-298a-4dc7-80cf-1c1c2ae5c8ab%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGMyg-bf%2Bup%3DecrFxQNYnXe%3DzW9tHOajJMmbYUt6hbi9BD17_w%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGMyg-bf%2Bup%3DecrFxQNYnXe%3DzW9tHOajJMmbYUt6hbi9BD17_w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGMyg-a6hrk1mKNv4mODjd70nNTb5n4QagB7Qumfao9fkzpwEw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to