LGTM1


On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 4:58 PM Nicolò Ribaudo <nicolo.riba...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Yes I made a mistake in the description. The destination for CSS modules
> is indeed "style", and not "css". Thanks for catching it!
>

Thanks for confirming!! :)


>
> On Wednesday, January 10, 2024 at 3:55:29 PM UTC+1 Yoav Weiss wrote:
>
>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 7:59:23 PM UTC+1 nrib...@igalia.com wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> For those looking for the spec diff relative to this change, you can find
>> it in the HTML and Fetch PRs that introduced it:
>> https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9486, https://github.com/whatwg/
>> fetch/pull/1691
>>
>> ---
>> Nicolò Ribaudo
>> On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 2:20:43 PM UTC+1 Nicolò Ribaudo wrote:
>>
>> Contact emails nrib...@igalia.com
>>
>>
>> Explainer None
>>
>> Specification https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#fetch-a-single-module-script
>>
>> Summary
>>
>> CSS and JSON modules will be fetched using a specific fetch destination
>> (either "css" or "json") rather than a generic "script", that is normally
>> used for JavaScript modules. This has the following effects: - the `Accept`
>> HTTP header in the request will describe the expected mime type
>> (`text/css,*/*;q=0.1` or `application/json,*/*;q=0.5`) - those modules will
>> respect the style-src or connect-src Content Security Policies, rather than
>> using JavaScript's script-src - When inspecting the request's destination
>> (either through a service worker or through the `Sec-Fetch-Destination`
>> HTTP header) it will be reported as `"css"` or `"json"`, rather than empty.
>>
>>
>> Can you confirm that you meant "style" destination for CSS modules,
>> rather than "css"?
>> That's what seemed to be defined in the spec PR, and it also makes more
>> sense IMO. (as it aligns with <link rel=stylesheet>, and doesn't a new
>> destination for CSS modules)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Blink component Blink>HTML>Modules
>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EHTML%3EModules>
>>
>> Search tags CSS modules
>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:CSS%20modules>, JSON modules
>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:JSON%20modules>, imports
>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:imports>, CSP
>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:CSP>, fetch destination
>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:fetch%20destination>
>>
>> TAG review None
>>
>> TAG review status Not applicable
>>
>> Risks
>>
>>
>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>
>> None
>>
>>
>> *Gecko*: No signal
>>
>> *WebKit*: Positive (https://github.com/WebKit/
>> standards-positions/issues/128) Webkit was supportive of the import
>> attributes proposal conditional on these changes to how JSON/CSS modules
>> are fetched
>>
>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>
>> *Other signals*:
>>
>> Security
>>
>> This feature better aligns usage of CSP directives to user expectations
>> (e.g. using style-src for CSS)
>>
>>
>> WebView application risks
>>
>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that
>> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>
>> None
>>
>>
>> Debuggability
>>
>> None
>>
>>
>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
>> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)? No
>>
>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>> ? Yes
>>
>> - https://wpt.fyi/results/fetch/api/request/destination/fetch-
>> destination.https.html - https://wpt.fyi/results/content-security-policy/
>> connect-src/connect-src-json-import-allowed.sub.html -
>> https://wpt.fyi/results/content-security-policy/
>> connect-src/connect-src-json-import-blocked.sub.html -
>> https://wpt.fyi/results/content-security-policy/style-
>> src/import-style-allowed.sub.html - https://wpt.fyi/results/
>> content-security-policy/style-src/import-style-blocked.sub.html
>>
>>
>> Flag name on chrome://flags None
>>
>> Finch feature name kFetchDestinationJsonCssModules
>>
>> Requires code in //chrome? False
>>
>> Tracking bug https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=
>> 1491336
>>
>> Estimated milestones
>>
>> No milestones specified
>>
>>
>> Anticipated spec changes None
>>
>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status https://chromestatus.com/
>> feature/4839834432831488
>>
>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>> <https://chromestatus.com>.
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohSKQe-EffvK%2BT82kJTCezVayDOjKN02f7e_f74NbujWCjQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to