No, Sec-Fetch-Dest 
<https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Sec-Fetch-Dest> 
is not changing. Sec-Fetch-Mode 
<https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Sec-Fetch-Mode> 
is.

On Wednesday, March 6, 2024 at 11:31:35 AM UTC-5 Chris Harrelson wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 8:28 AM Nicolás Peña <n...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, March 6, 2024 at 5:11:09 AM UTC-5 Yoav Weiss wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 10:21 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <
>> yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 9:36 PM Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> LGTM1
>> On 3/4/24 1:33 PM, Nicolás Peña wrote:
>>
>> Contact emails 
>>
>> n...@chromium.org
>>
>> Explainer 
>>
>> https://github.com/fedidcg/FedCM/issues/428 
>>
>>
>> A few lines summarizing this issue would be most useful when evaluating 
>> this and understanding what y'all want to ship.
>> In particular, it'd be useful to understand the request flow, what is the 
>> request's origin (as IIUC, we're talking about requests issued from the 
>> browser), and what is the request destination that we may want IDPs to 
>> check.
>>
>> Examples of the checks IDPs would have to make would also be helpful.
>>
>>
>> Sure! From the spec 
>> <https://fedidcg.github.io/FedCM/#idp-api-id-assertion-endpoint>, here 
>> is a sample request:
>>
>> POST /fedcm_assertion_endpoint HTTP/1.1
>> Host: idp.example
>> Origin: https://rp.example/
>> Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
>> Cookie: 0x23223
>> Sec-Fetch-Dest: webidentity
>>
>> account_id=123&client_id=client1234&nonce=Ct60bD&disclosure_text_shown=true
>>  
>> With this change, Sec-Fetch-Mode will now be cors in this request and the 
>> IDP is expected to return the following in the response (no preflight is 
>> performed):
>>
>
> Do you mean Sec-Fetch-Dest?
>  
>
>>
>> Access-Control-Allow-Origin: https://rp.example/
>> Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true
>>  
>>
>>
>> Also, is the "identity assertion" endpoint the same as the token endpoint 
>> <https://github.com/fedidcg/FedCM/blob/main/explainer.md#token_endpoint>?
>>
>>
>> Yea. I think that explainer doc is not super up to date.
>>  
>>
>>
>> Specification 
>>
>> https://github.com/fedidcg/FedCM/pull/547 
>>
>> Summary 
>>
>> The fetches in the FedCM API are hard to reason about because of the 
>> properties required of them. While there is ongoing discussion regarding 
>> the accounts endpoint, there is broad consensus that the ID assertion 
>> endpoint should use CORS. This aligns security properties of this fetch 
>> more closely to other fetches in the web platform.
>>
>> Blink component 
>>
>> Blink>Identity>FedCM 
>> <https://g-issues.chromium.org/issues?q=status:open%20componentid:1456331&pli=1&authuser=0>
>>
>> TAG review 
>>
>> Not requesting a TAG review. We have already had extensive discussions 
>> with Fetch experts.
>>
>> TAG review status 
>>
>> N/A
>>
>> Risks
>>
>> Interoperability and Compatibility 
>>
>> This is a backwards incompatible feature, but one that is warranted due 
>> to consensus reached by our security reviewers as well as other browser 
>> vendor engineers. We have a manageable list of IDPs that we know are using 
>> the FedCM API and we have reached out to all IDPs that are currently 
>> deploying FedCM to make sure that they won’t break with this change.
>>
>>
>> Gecko: Positive based on TPAC discussions and https://github.com/fedidcg/
>> FedCM/issues/428. Not filing a standards position request for small 
>> additions at the explicit request from Firefox (they prefer PRs).
>>
>> WebKit: Positive based on TPAC discussions and 
>> https://github.com/fedidcg/FedCM/issues/428. Recently, standards 
>> position requests for smaller FedCM features have been closed, pointing to 
>> the (unresolved) main FedCM one in https://github.com/WebKit/
>> standards-positions/issues/309 so not filing one for this.
>>
>> Web developers: No signals
>>
>> Other signals:
>>
>> Ergonomics 
>>
>> N/A
>>
>>
>> Activation 
>>
>> N/A
>>
>>
>> Security 
>>
>> By adding CORS, we add a check that the IDP explicitly agrees for the 
>> browser to share the ID assertion response to the RP. In addition, having 
>> this fetch align with most other credentialed fetches in the browser means 
>> that any future protections are received by default, and we do not have to 
>> special case this fetch.
>>
>>
>> WebView application risks 
>>
>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that 
>> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>
>> None
>>
>>
>> Debuggability 
>>
>> We surface errors when there is a network problem with the ID assertion 
>> fetch. This will help developers understand when this feature introduces a 
>> problem in their FedCM calls.
>>
>>
>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, 
>> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)? 
>>
>> No. FedCM is not supported on Android WebView.
>>
>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>> ? 
>>
>> https://wpt.fyi/results/credential-management/fedcm-
>> identity-assertion-nocors.https.html?label=experimental&
>> label=master&aligned (will pass on Chrome once we ship)
>>
>> Flag name on chrome://flags 
>>
>> None
>>
>> Finch feature name 
>>
>> FedCmIdAssertionCORS
>>
>> Requires code in //chrome? 
>>
>> True (because FedCM API does)
>>
>> Tracking bug 
>>
>> https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40284123
>>
>> Estimated milestones 
>>
>> DevTrial on desktop
>>
>> 120
>>
>>
>> DevTrial on Android
>>
>> 120
>>
>> We want to ship on M124
>>
>> Anticipated spec changes 
>>
>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues 
>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of 
>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>
>> https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1637
>>
>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status 
>>
>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5094763339710464
>>
>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/
>> chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/1814484e-4a0c-4210-b936-
>> 29ead46f32c5n%40chromium.org 
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/1814484e-4a0c-4210-b936-29ead46f32c5n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/
>> chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/91c26d40-ccc9-4abe-bf97-
>> 38cd9e48f684%40chromium.org 
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/91c26d40-ccc9-4abe-bf97-38cd9e48f684%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/a349c863-9904-491f-9e9d-31227683d4ffn%40chromium.org
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/a349c863-9904-491f-9e9d-31227683d4ffn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/5fe0ce61-310b-4dac-b1ba-cbbbb0925921n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to