Hi, please fill out these reviews on your chromestatus entry:

[image: image.png]

On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 8:09 PM 'Siye Liu' via blink-dev <
blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:

> Yes, the API returns offset inside text input and textarea elements.
>
> Thanks,
> Siye
>
> On Wednesday, June 5, 2024 at 5:10:18 PM UTC-7 Brian Birtles wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does this return the offset inside text input elements like Gecko's
>> implementation?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Brian
>>
>> 2024年6月6日木曜日 3:20:24 UTC+9 si...@microsoft.com:
>>
>>> Contact emails
>>> si...@microsoft.com, sa...@microsoft.com
>>>
>>> Explainer
>>> None
>>>
>>> Specification
>>> https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom-view/#dom-document-caretpositionfrompoint
>>>
>>> Summary
>>> This new API allows users to get current caret position from a given
>>> screen point.
>>>
>>> The API returns a CaretPosition object which represents the caret
>>> position indicating current text insertion point including the containing
>>> DOM node, caret's character offset, and the client rectangle of caret
>>> range. The API also supports get CaretPosition inside Shadow DOM. To get
>>> CaretPosition inside Shadow DOM, caller needs to provide reference to all
>>> the shadow roots that this API can pierce into.
>>>
>>>
>>> Blink component
>>> Blink>CSS
>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3ECSS>
>>>
>>> TAG review
>>> document.caretPositionFromPoint API in shadow DOM scenario · Issue #949
>>> · w3ctag/design-reviews (github.com)
>>> <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/949>
>>>
>>> TAG review status
>>> Issues open
>>>
>>> Risks
>>>
>>>
>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>> Gecko already implemented the API without the argument that contains
>>> shadow roots that this API can pierce into. Webkit/Blink didn't implement
>>> it. The Gecko implementation in shadow DOM scenario is not spec-compliant
>>> either (Spec changed recently to cover shadow DOM scenario). Gecko 's
>>> position is positive on this API. We expect that Gecko's behavior will be
>>> changed to be spec-compliant in the future. There is also a future compat
>>> risk too if we decided to deprecate the non-standard API
>>> `document.caretRangeFromPoint`: https://crbug.com/690599
>>>
>>>
>>> *Gecko*: Positive (
>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1012)
>>>
>>> *WebKit*: Support (
>>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/301)
>>>
>>> *Web developers*: Positive (
>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=388976#c34) Web
>>> developers are asking to have document.caretPositionFromPoint API
>>> implemented in Blink:
>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=388976#c28
>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=388976#c34
>>>
>>> *Other signals*:
>>>
>>> WebView application risks
>>> *Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?*
>>> None
>>>
>>>
>>> Debuggability
>>> None
>>>
>>>
>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
>>> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>>> Yes
>>>
>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>> ?
>>> Yes
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/css/cssom/caretPositionFromPoint.html
>>> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/shadow-dom/Document-caretPositionFromPoint.tentative.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Flag name on chrome://flags
>>> None
>>>
>>> Finch feature name
>>> CaretPositionFromPoint
>>>
>>> Requires code in //chrome?
>>> False
>>>
>>> Tracking bug
>>> https://crbug.com/388976
>>>
>>> Estimated milestones
>>> Shipping on desktop
>>> 127
>>> DevTrial on desktop
>>> 127
>>>
>>>
>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>> *Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of
>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).*
>>> None
>>>
>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5201014343073792
>>>
>>> Links to previous Intent discussions
>>> Intent to prototype:
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/2618db7c-56d2-4ff2-89c5-df65e1dfe6c7n%40chromium.org
>>>  Ready
>>> for Trial:
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/v4MLESmFR1c/m/UhstKjucAAAJ
>>>
>>>
>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/4127f29a-82e6-41d0-bab4-596f66fa43c9n%40chromium.org
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/4127f29a-82e6-41d0-bab4-596f66fa43c9n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw_mF%2BSbCsy%2BNTifai-c%3D-dmFCNDxOpQithguD44mQm7Ww%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to