I see - thanks for the info Paul. It seems like an unintentional mixup.

When I approved the previous extension I wrote: "I would like to see draft specifications and progress on making this testable via WPTs"

Russ thanks for linking to https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/brusshamilton/turtledove/pull/1200.html - based on this draft PR <https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/1200/files>. You wrote that it describes _some_ of the changes, can you speak to what is missing (that you will presumably spec ahead of an I2S)?

And thanks for beginning to land WPTs <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5622101>.

On 6/28/24 1:59 PM, Paul Jensen wrote:
Mike,

It looks like we did continue the OT during M122-124 before sending the first I2EE, despite initially only asking for approval for M119-121.  I wonder if someone went off of the current OT policy of "An initial origin trial or experiment for a feature may only run for 6 milestones" <https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features/#widen-review:~:text=An%20initial%20origin%20trial%20or%20experiment%20for%20a%20feature%20may%20only%20run%20for%206%20milestones> without knowing my initial ask was for just 3 milestones.  I apologize for that and am going to seek updating internal processes to add a check to prevent this oversight from happening again, even if the initial I2EE is "fairly mechanical" as you said originally.

On Wednesday, June 26, 2024 at 1:53:56 PM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote:

    Hi Russ,

    I'm trying to refresh my memory on the history of this experiment.

    Experiment first approved on 10/19/23 for M119 to M121,
    
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/2bwMHd3Yz7I/m/BzI3_qoCAwAJ
    
<https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/2bwMHd3Yz7I/m/BzI3_qoCAwAJ>


    Request on 4/4/24 to renew from M124 to M127,
    
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/2bwMHd3Yz7I/m/xaJHFJ_uAAAJ
    
<https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/2bwMHd3Yz7I/m/xaJHFJ_uAAAJ>


    Approved 4/12/24 (“for another 3 milestones”),
    
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/2bwMHd3Yz7I/m/Pm842qm_AAAJ
    
<https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/2bwMHd3Yz7I/m/Pm842qm_AAAJ>


    Requesting M127 to M130 on 6/20/24,
    
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/2bwMHd3Yz7I/m/RigQFZilAgAJ
    
<https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/2bwMHd3Yz7I/m/RigQFZilAgAJ>


    Question: what happened between M122 and M124? Was the experiment
    not running?


    On 6/20/24 2:52 PM, 'Russ Hamilton' via blink-dev wrote:
    (Now *To* blink-dev instead of just CC)


            Contact emails

    pauljen...@chromium.org, behamil...@google.com


            Explainer

    Chrome:
    
https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/blob/main/FLEDGE_browser_bidding_and_auction_API.md
    
<https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/blob/main/FLEDGE_browser_bidding_and_auction_API.md>

    Services:
    
https://github.com/privacysandbox/fledge-docs/blob/main/bidding_auction_services_api.md
    
<https://github.com/privacysandbox/fledge-docs/blob/main/bidding_auction_services_api.md>

    Note that this explainer has a helpful onboarding section
    
<https://github.com/privacysandbox/fledge-docs/blob/main/bidding_auction_services_api.md#onboarding-and-alpha-testing-guide>for
    setting up the services.


            Specification

    A work-in-progress pull request
    
<https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/brusshamilton/turtledove/pull/1200.html>on
    the Protected Audience spec
    <https://wicg.github.io/turtledove/>describes some of the changes
    to the W3C spec. We are reaching out to the IETF ART Area
    Directors for assistance beginning the standardization process
    for some of the server-side aspects of this API.


            Summary

    We propose extending the Bidding and Auction Services origin
    trial currently operating on 1% stable.

    Recent changes:

     *

        Prompted by developer concerns about scalability, we have
        recently added support in M127 for limiting the size of the
        Bidding and Auction request payload

     *

        We also added controls to enable sellers to select which
        buyers are included in the payload when it doesn’t affect the
        outwardly visible size of the encrypted data.

     *

        Additionally the Bidding and Auction server has recently
        added support for features such as buyerReportingId and bid
        currency.

    We have decided to extend the experiment to give developers time
    to experiment with the new features. We would like to request
    extending the end milestone from M127 to M130.


            Blink component

    Blink>InterestGroups
    
<https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EInterestGroups>


            TAG review

    For Protected Audience:
    https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/723
    <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/723>


            TAG review status

    Completed for Protected Audience, resolved unsatisfied.


            Interoperability and Compatibility


            Gecko & WebKit: No signal on parent proposal, Protected
            Audience.  Asked in the Mozilla forumhere
            <https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/770>,
            and in the Webkit forum here
            <https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/158>.


            Edge: Microsoft has proposed their Ad Selection API
            (https://github.com/WICG/privacy-preserving-ads/
            <https://github.com/WICG/privacy-preserving-ads/tree/main>)
            as a similar TEE on-server auction API. That API looks
            like it would have an identical Web Platform API as the
            Bidding and Auction Services API. We have biweekly
            meetings with Microsoft, and are open to collaborating on
            specifying the API.

    WPT Tests

    We have started to implement some tests
    <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5622101?>,
    but work is still ongoing.


            Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status

    https://chromestatus.com/feature/4649601971257344
    <https://chromestatus.com/feature/4649601971257344>


            Links to previous Intent discussions

    Intent to prototype:
    
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CABQTWrnSdvf7RgK2wxsmC6rWc8eRoqDZOvgwVFuEx1r2nqmAJg%40mail.gmail.com
    
<https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CABQTWrnSdvf7RgK2wxsmC6rWc8eRoqDZOvgwVFuEx1r2nqmAJg%40mail.gmail.com>


            Intent to Experiment:

    https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/2bwMHd3Yz7I
    
<https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/2bwMHd3Yz7I/m/BwMKwPP6GQAJ>


    Intent to Extend Experiment:

    
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/2bwMHd3Yz7I/m/xaJHFJ_uAAAJ
    
<https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/2bwMHd3Yz7I/m/xaJHFJ_uAAAJ>


    Thanks,


    –Benjamin “Russ” Hamilton

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org
    <mailto:blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org>.
    To view this discussion on the web visit
    
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAG-DU1Euju6f97P1kjqTfggWUBZEgEdPA43KL25ZUzHqJ_9uQ%40mail.gmail.com
    
<https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAG-DU1Euju6f97P1kjqTfggWUBZEgEdPA43KL25ZUzHqJ_9uQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/682701b9-6350-442b-9f68-e9921cfd319c%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to