On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 6:52 AM Mustaq Ahmed <[email protected]> wrote:

> Contact [email protected]
>
> ExplainerNone
>
> Specificationhttps://w3c.github.io/pointerevents/#pointerevent-interface
>
> Summary
>
> The Pointer Events Working Group made PointerEvent.getCoalescedEvents()
> restricted to secure contexts 4+ years ago, which removed the API from
> insecure contexts. Chrome originally shipped the old behavior and didn't
> follow the spec change immediately because of compat concerns. We are now
> removing it from insecure contexts because Chrome usage in insecure
> contexts turned out to be very low.
>
>
> Blink componentBlink>Input
> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EInput>
>
> TAG reviewNone
>
> TAG review statusNot applicable
>
> Risks
>
>
> Interoperability and Compatibility
>
> Interop: This will improves Interop, making Chrome fully match Firefox
> (and the spec). Compat: There is a bit of risk because the usage is
> non-zero (~0.0004% as of 2024-07-16). This usage stat is expected to
> include non-breaking JS enumerations.
> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4598
>
>
> *Gecko*: Shipped/Shipping
>
> *WebKit*: No signal
>

Can you ask for WebKit's position? Or maye there's at least a pointer to
working group discussions they participated in?


>
> *Web developers*: No signals
>
> *Other signals*:
>
> WebView application risks
>
> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that
> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>
> None
>
>
> Debuggability
>
> None
>
>
> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?Yes
>
> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
> ?Yes
>
>
> https://wpt.fyi/results/pointerevents?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=pointerevents%2Fpointerevent_constructor
>
>
> Flag name on chrome://flagsNone
>
> Finch feature nameNone
>
> Non-finch justificationNone
>

Our process requires a Finch feature in general. And this sort of
potentially-risky removal seems like the kind of thing that benefits from a
Finch feature, so that it can be remotely reverted if it causes terrible
regressions.


>
>
> Requires code in //chrome?False
>
> Tracking bughttps://issues.chromium.org/40928769
>
> Estimated milestones
> Shipping on desktop 129
> Shipping on Android 129
> Shipping on WebView 129
>
> Anticipated spec changes
>
> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of
> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
> None
>
> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/4941651093749760?gate=5095189648244736
>
> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAB0cuO6UzHtEJdgeZGMChev-UbP0N5ts4AuJ9mKtr-aLWYbKWw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAB0cuO6UzHtEJdgeZGMChev-UbP0N5ts4AuJ9mKtr-aLWYbKWw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAM0wra_wx6qw2tW2ut8qwHQGQtCZFkWVj9RG%3DJohzV5N6SgSLA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to