We also extended our feature detection API to facilitate detecting this 
feature:
Explainer: https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/1238
Spec: https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/1245
On Wednesday, July 31, 2024 at 12:51:08 PM UTC-4 Paul Jensen wrote:

> Contact emails
>
> pauljen...@chromium.org
>
>
> Explainer
>
> https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/blob/main/PA_real_time_monitoring.md
>
>
> Specification
>
> https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/1212
>
>
> Summary
>
> The goal of real-time monitoring is to get Protected Audience API auction 
> monitoring data to the buyer and seller as quickly as possible (e.g. < 5 
> mins). The primary use-case we are trying to capture with this reporting 
> surface, the Protected Audience Real Time Monitoring (RTM) API, is rapid 
> error detection i.e. detecting quickly whether there are major problems 
> with unexpected behavior in generateBid(), scoreAd(), or loading of bidding 
> or scoring scripts or trusted signals. To offer reduced latency over other 
> reporting mechanisms like the Private Aggregation API, the RTM API uses the 
> local differentially private RAPPOR algorithm with an epsilon of one.  The 
> reduced latency is traded off for a limited number of histogram buckets and 
> significant noise.
>
>
> Blink component
>
> Blink>InterestGroups 
> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=component:Blink%3EInterestGroups>
>
>
> TAG review
>
> For Protected Audience: 
> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/723
>
>
> TAG review status
>
> Completed for Protected Audience, resolved unsatisfied.
>
>
> RisksPrivacy
>
> At the epsilon we are proposing (𝜖 = 1), the information leaked is 
> limited to approximately 0.18 bits per auction. This makes it very 
> difficult for a bad actor to gain any meaningful user identifying 
> information from an auction using this API.
>
> While the tight privacy parameters provide strong protections, there are 
> two privacy considerations of note:
>
>    - 
>    
>    It reveals a small amount of information from scoreAd and generateBid 
>    to sellers and bidders, respectively. These contents are protected by the 
>    locally differentially private RAPPOR algorithm. The scope of this risk 
> can 
>    be measured with the privacy loss epsilon parameter. This risk could be 
>    magnified by a bad actor running many auctions solely for the purpose of 
>    collecting more information from a publisher page. We mitigate this risk 
> by 
>    bounding the number of contributions that this API will send to an adtech 
>    from a page in a given period of time for each browser.
>    - 
>    
>    It reveals to the ad tech the fact that it had an interest group 
>    present on the device. This is mitigated by the fact that the reports are 
>    sent to a fixed path and include only heavily noised signals. We also 
>    considered sending reports to all eligible auction participants for a 
>    given auction (i.e. all those present in interestGroupBuyers, even if they 
>    do not have interest groups), but this will result in an overwhelming 
>    number of reports sent.
>    
> We plan to address both these considerations in future work 
> <https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/blob/main/PA_real_time_monitoring.md#limitations-and-future-work>
> .
> Interoperability and Compatibility
>
> This feature represents optional new behavior that shouldn’t break 
> existing usage.
>
>
> Gecko & WebKit: No signal on parent proposal, Protected Audience.  Asked 
> in the Mozilla forum here 
> <https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/770>, and in the 
> Webkit forum here 
> <https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/158>.
>
>
> Edge: Edge has announced plans to support the Ad Selection API 
> <https://github.com/WICG/privacy-preserving-ads/blob/main/README.md> 
> which shares much of its API surface with Protected Audience.
>
>
> Web developers: Interest from 5 companies on GitHub issue 
> <https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/issues/430> and significant interest 
> on WICG call discussion 
> <https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/blob/main/meetings/2024-02-28-FLEDGE-call-minutes.md?plain=1#L120>
> .
>
>
> Debuggability
>
> RTM API network requests will show up in the Chrome Developer Tools 
> network panel. Calls to the RTM API from Protected Audience bidding and 
> scoring scripts should also be debuggable with Chrome Developer Tools.
>
>
> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, 
> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>
> It will be supported on all platforms that support Protected Audience, so 
> all but WebView.
>
>
> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
> ?
>
> We’ve landed some 
> <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/f118165cd650448765d2e0efd3d7ee71f1e15e4f/fledge/tentative/auction-config.https.window.js#L510>
>  
> but plan to land more web-platform-tests shortly.
>
>
> Flag name on chrome://flags
>
> None
>
>
> Finch feature name
>
> RealTimeReporting
>
>
> Requires code in //chrome?
>
> False
>
>
> Estimated milestones
>
> Shipping on desktop and Android in M128.
>
> Anticipated spec changes
>
> None
>
>
> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5200293940428800
>
>
> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/d93f9942-00b9-42d0-bb11-5d0f530e8bebn%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to