Does this integrate with scroll timelines and animations at all?

On Wednesday, November 13, 2024 at 1:38:36 AM UTC-8 Rune Lillesveen wrote:

> Four issues are opened against the spec:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11181
> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11182
> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11183
> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11127
>
> The one that's blocking shipping is the potential renaming from 
> 'overflowing' to 'scrollable': 
> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11182
>
> Two of the others are convenience keyword additions, and the last one is a 
> non-behavioral editorial change to the spec.
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 2:12 PM Rune Lillesveen <futh...@chromium.org> 
> wrote:
>
>> Contact emailsfuth...@chromium.org
>>
>> Explainer
>> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-conditional-5/scroll_state_explainer.html
>> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-conditional-5/scroll_state_explainer.md
>>
>> Specification
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/css-conditional-5/#scroll-state-container
>>
>> Summary
>>
>> Use container queries to style descendants of containers based on their 
>> scroll state. The query container is either a scroll container, or an 
>> element affected by the scroll position of a scroll container. The 
>> following states can be queried: - Whether a sticky positioned container is 
>> stuck to one of the edges of the scroll box (stuck) - Whether a scroll snap 
>> aligned container is currently snapped horizontally or vertically (snapped) 
>> - Whether a scroll container can be scrolled in a queried direction 
>> (overflowing) A new container-type:scroll-state is introduced to allow such 
>> containers to be queried. For instance: #sticky { position: sticky; 
>> container-type: scroll-state; } @container scroll-state(stuck: top) { 
>> #sticky-child { font-size: 75% } } 
>>
>>
>> Blink componentBlink>CSS 
>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3ECSS>
>>
>> TAG reviewhttps://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/885
>>
>> TAG review statusIssues addressed
>>
>> Risks
>>
>>
>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>
>> Risk: none of the other vendors have committed to implement yet. 
>>
>>
>> *Gecko*: No signal (
>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/896)
>>
>> *WebKit*: No signal (
>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/261)
>>
>> *Web developers*: Positive (
>> https://utilitybend.com/blog/is-the-sticky-thing-stuck-is-the-snappy-item-snapped-a-look-at-state-queries-in-css)
>>  
>> Also, https://ishadeed.com/article/css-state-queries/
>>
>> *Other signals*:
>>
>> WebView application risks
>>
>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that 
>> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>
>> None
>>
>>
>> Debuggability
>>
>> - Elements are marked with a "container" badge for scroll-state as for 
>> size containers - @container rules in matching styles have a link back to 
>> the container element as for size containers - No further support as of 
>> now. Future improvements could be - Having an indication of container type 
>> in the element badge - Some indication along with the query which feature 
>> is matched with which value 
>>
>>
>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, 
>> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?Yes
>>
>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>> ?Yes
>>
>> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-conditional/container-queries/scroll-state
>>
>>
>> Flag name on about://flags#enable-experimental-web-platform-features
>>
>> Finch feature nameCSSStickyContainerQueries, CSSSnapContainerQueries, 
>> CSSOverflowContainerQueries
>>
>> Requires code in //chrome?False
>>
>> Tracking bughttps://crbug.com/40268059
>>
>> Sample links
>> https://codepen.io/argyleink/pen/JjqVzxq
>> https://codepen.io/argyleink/pen/rNgbbOP
>> https://codepen.io/argyleink/pen/wvbZZWP
>> https://codepen.io/argyleink/pen/zYbEdGm
>> https://codepen.io/argyleink/pen/vYPzdGp
>> https://codepen.io/argyleink/pen/PoMJvXN
>>
>> Estimated milestones
>> Shipping on desktop 133
>> DevTrial on desktop 116
>> Shipping on Android 133
>> DevTrial on Android 116
>> Shipping on WebView 133
>>
>> Anticipated spec changes
>>
>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues 
>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of 
>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>> None
>>
>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5072263730167808?gate=5092937152593920
>>
>> Links to previous Intent discussionsIntent to Prototype: 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CACuPfeQyse1btL_jhkEQJT9WCsR2sndRo8i%3DyHmzgPu6sDpDOw%40mail.gmail.com
>>
>>
>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>
>> -- 
>> Rune Lillesveen
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> Rune Lillesveen
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/2a83d73a-4e16-4be3-8666-8870c8ffe070n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to