>
>
>
> I think it would be worth asking for a standards-position specifically for
> the exposing-cross-origin change, as it has security implications and
> getting each implementation's perspective would be valuable.
>
> Alternatively, if you have recorded Working Group minutes or a spec PR
> where a Firefox representative was present for consensus on this change,
> that'd work for me too.
>

Sure! We talked about presentation times in detail, including this
coarsening in particular and the reasoning for it, in the last WebPerfWG
call. Minutes available in this link
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZWAUJZBJUvSUyShvKXNEU-cuCe47jpgbR69ckWZUTfI/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.kb3idfbysfg7>.
We've also discussed the TAO thing in particular here
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tw9QTHWvXg-loG6qaeeosOXTCeH41wst6MehQsc3WwM/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.ex3ms275azam>
.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAJn%3DMYZXx-NaYWBY8t3r%3Dz5Ff50baJebiEkWKbHO9TXYRfA8kA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to