Hi Mike,

Thanks for flagging this. We have requested all of the bits in the 
chromestatus entry.

Thanks,
Akash

On Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 7:17:03 AM UTC-8 Mike Taylor wrote:

> Please request the various bits in your chromestatus entry, thanks.
> On 1/24/25 5:05 PM, 'Akash Nadan' via blink-dev wrote:
>
> Contact emails 
>
> akash...@google.com, lin...@chromium.org, john...@chromium.org, 
> arp...@chromium.org
>
> Explainer 
>
> Attribution Reporting API with Aggregatable Reports 
> <https://github.com/WICG/attribution-reporting-api/blob/main/AGGREGATE.md>
>
> Aggregation Service for the Attribution Reporting API 
> <https://github.com/WICG/attribution-reporting-api/blob/main/AGGREGATION_SERVICE_TEE.md>
>
> Specification 
>
> https://wicg.github.io/attribution-reporting-api/
>
> Blink component 
>
> Internals > AttributionReporting 
> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Internals%3EAttributionReporting>
>
> TAG review 
>
> Original I2S for the Attribution Reporting API - Closed 
> <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/724>
>
> TAG review status 
>
> Declined 
> <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/724#issuecomment-2234828340>
>
> Summary 
>
> We are landing the following change to the Attribution Reporting API 
> focused on:
>
>    - 
>    
>    Removing aggregatable report limit when trigger context ID is non-null
>    
>
> This change is based on API caller feedback and the need for being able to 
> measure a higher number of conversion events for certain user flows.
>
> Currently the API has a limit that allows up to 20 aggregatable reports to 
> be generated per source registration which is restrictive for use cases 
> where a user may have a longer user journey. This change removes the 
> aggregatable report limit when a trigger context ID is provided as part of 
> the registration. The removal of this limit is restricted to only when the 
> trigger context ID is specified, because when it is specified the API 
> applies a higher rate of null reports which helps to protect against 
> cross-site information leaking through report counts.
>
> Additionally, aggregatable reports will still be bound by other limits 
> that restrict the total amount of information that can be measured, such as 
> the L1 contribution budget (65,536) per source and the attribution rate 
> limit.
>
> Explainer/Spec changes 
>    
>    1. 
>    
>    Explainer & Spec: 
>    https://github.com/WICG/attribution-reporting-api/pull/1475
>    
>
> Risks
> Interoperability and Compatibility 
>
> This change is not a fully backwards compatible change. There’s no API 
> surface change, but it can cause the API to behave differently given the 
> same set of inputs. The API caller may receive more aggregatable reports if 
> they use the trigger context ID feature, whereas previously if they tried 
> to generate more than 20 aggregatable reports for a given source 
> registration, then any reports beyond 20 would be rejected and not 
> generated. This change is unlikely to cause any issues for API callers 
> given they will still be able to receive the reports they currently receive 
> without any changes. Additionally, this feature does not break any 
> pre-existing API or web functionality.
>
> Gecko: No signal (Original request: 
> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/791)
>
> WebKit: No signal (Original request: 
> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/180)
>
>
> WebView application risks 
>
> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that 
> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>
> No
>
>               
> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, 
> Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>
> This feature is expected to be supported in Android WebView in the future 
> alongside Android platform support. 
> <https://developers.google.com/privacy-sandbox/private-advertising/attribution-reporting/android>
>
> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
> ?
>
> No, currently this feature is not covered in WPT due to difficulty of 
> adding significant coverage for Attribution Reporting API because of 
> API-mandated delays and noise. However, the feature is covered by 
> comprehensive integration tests (commonly referred to as “interop tests”) 
> that are also reusable by other implementations. 
>
> Estimated milestones 
>
> This feature is anticipated to ship as part of Chrome M134 
> <https://chromiumdash.appspot.com/schedule>. 
>
> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status 
>
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5079048977645568
>
> Links to previous Intent discussions 
>
> Previous I2S: 
>
> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting API 
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/2Rmj5V6FSaY>
>
> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M117 
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/nWF61c8xu-M/m/uMmH1ewcAQAJ>
>
> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M118 
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/Mh-mJiyJZFk/m/HlgzpphYBQAJ>
>
> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M119 
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/6e44SBtEtcQ>
>
> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M120 
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/jSk3xpNPzGQ/m/VZPsdYgGCAAJ>
>
> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M121 
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/g9KiC6Rg_mA/m/V679WcWuAQAJ>
>
> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M123 
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/NE7VGke1Bjc/m/bIX00t4CAAAJ>
>
> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M124 
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/aregp1li6xk/m/IhBB2z8tBQAJ>
>
> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M125 
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/9UyhI6SRyxM/m/zgWWckgWAQAJ>
>
> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M126 
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/7UQR2lPn5KE/m/q_kL6ZiJDgAJ>
>
> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M127 
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/LAgnyPsJyJg?pli=1>
>
> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M128 (1) 
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/qlsv7fn0zRE/m/SK8upePCCAAJ>
>
> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M128 (2) 
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/VKGn41wMYlg/m/VsNXktqvCAAJ>
>
> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M130 
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/-K2xDYuvmmA/m/Fhp564I7AgAJ>
>
> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M132 (1) 
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/T6i4a_hNeXk/m/Z1WwZTZMAAAJ>
>
> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M132 (2) 
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/pc6n8o-S_Ns/m/sWah9fSmAQAJ>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion visit 
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/9910bd89-51a5-4766-b3b7-afd0412ff602n%40chromium.org
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/9910bd89-51a5-4766-b3b7-afd0412ff602n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/4470f630-cefa-4b28-b718-259a00e44c3bn%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to