Just a quick heads-up: I'm planning to prototype Direct Sockets support in 
Shared & Service Workers in Isolated Web Apps. You can find more details in 
the corresponding ChromeStatus entry here: 
https://chromestatus.com/feature/5169039028256768. There will also be a 
separate Intent-to-Ship submitted eventually.

Kind regards,
Andrew

On Wednesday, September 11, 2024 at 6:05:39 PM UTC+2 Vladimir Levin wrote:

> LGTM3 for the IWAs in its current form where it is limited to enterprise 
> customers. This and features similar to this would need to be revisited if 
> IWAs shift to a more public audience. If and when that happens, it would be 
> nice to understand the vetting / review process to judge whether some of 
> these features can be available more publicly. 
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 1:25 PM Reilly Grant <rei...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> The Promise returned by the "opened" attribute serves that purpose. We 
>> used this pattern because it aligns with the WebSocketStream and 
>> WebTransport constructors. 
>> Reilly Grant | Software Engineer | rei...@chromium.org | Google Chrome 
>> <https://www.google.com/chrome>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 8:55 AM Alex Russell <sligh...@chromium.org> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In today's API OWNERS meeting, Jeff raised the concern that this API 
>>> design doesn't follow our general guidance for having a Promise-returning 
>>> `request*()` method that integrates with the Permissions API and allows the 
>>> UA to inject controls (including, potentially, user prompts). This is our 
>>> long-running pattern for gating exotic APIs, including all of the Fugu APIs.
>>>
>>> Is there a reason this wasn't adopted here? Even in cases where an admin 
>>> blesses an IWA, we should expect there to be cases where we'll want async 
>>> gating for things like policy controls.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, August 28, 2024 at 6:37:49 AM UTC-7 Mike Taylor wrote:
>>>
>>>> LGTM2
>>>> On 8/28/24 8:03 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> LGTM1 - the use case is clear, as well as the dangers of enabling this 
>>>> over the open web. Confining this API to IWAs seems to strike a reasonable 
>>>> balance.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 3:46 PM 'Randell Jesup' via blink-dev <
>>>> blin...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This was not closed by Mozilla with no opinion, it was closed as 
>>>>> Harmful. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Randell Jesup, Mozilla Networking Team
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024, 2:59 PM Chromestatus <
>>>>> ad...@cr-status.appspotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Contact emails green...@google.com 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Explainer 
>>>>>> https://github.com/WICG/direct-sockets/blob/main/docs/explainer.md 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Specification https://wicg.github.io/direct-sockets 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Summary 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Allows Isolated Web Apps to establish direct transmission control 
>>>>>> protocol (TCP) and user datagram protocol (UDP) communications with 
>>>>>> network 
>>>>>> devices and systems as well as listen to and accept incoming connections.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Blink component Blink>Network>Direct Sockets 
>>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3ENetwork%3EDirect%20Sockets>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Search tags networking <http:///features#tags:networking>, TCP 
>>>>>> <http:///features#tags:TCP>, UDP <http:///features#tags:UDP>, sockets 
>>>>>> <http:///features#tags:sockets> 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TAG review https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/548 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TAG review status Pending 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Risks 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Other browsers may choose to implement this API.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Gecko*: Closed Without a Position (
>>>>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/431) 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *WebKit*: No signal 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Web developers*: Positive (
>>>>>> https://discourse.wicg.io/t/filling-the-remaining-gap-between-websocket-webrtc-and-webtranspor/4366)
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Numerous potential use cases have been suggested. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Other signals*: 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Security 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Various security risks and mitigations are noted in 
>>>>>> https://github.com/WICG/raw-sockets/blob/master/docs/explainer.md#security-considerations
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> This is a powerful API. Users will have the opportunity to give Isolated 
>>>>>> Web Apps access to local hardware, and information systems behind 
>>>>>> organization firewalls. Mitigations are designed to ensure this cannot 
>>>>>> happen accidentally, and only through enterprise policies or the 
>>>>>> friction 
>>>>>> of installing a native app.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WebView application risks 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> N/A. Feature not compiled in Android.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Debuggability 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The code using this API can be debugged using the standard tools. 
>>>>>> Integrating the API with the DevTools Networking tab to enable easier 
>>>>>> introspection of the state of these connections as well as the data 
>>>>>> transferred could be a beneficial future improvement. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, 
>>>>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)? No 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This feature is implemented on desktop platforms, although it will 
>>>>>> only be available to the end users on platforms that support Isolated 
>>>>>> Web 
>>>>>> Apps, which is currently only ChromeOS. Android is excluded for 
>>>>>> historical 
>>>>>> reasons, although there are no apparent interoperability blockers here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>>> ? Yes 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These tests require a specific --isolated-context-origins flag to be 
>>>>>> tested in WPTs, so they're run as a part of a virtual suite and are not 
>>>>>> reflected on wpt.fyi. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Flag name on chrome://flags #enable-direct-sockets-web-api 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Finch feature name DirectSockets 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Requires code in //chrome? False 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tracking bug 
>>>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=909927 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Launch bug https://launch.corp.google.com/launch/4339602 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Measurement We have the following histograms for tracking network 
>>>>>> failures upon creating sockets (prefixed with DirectSockets.*): - 
>>>>>> TCPNetworkFailures - UDPNetworkFailures - TCPServerNetworkFailures 
>>>>>> Separate 
>>>>>> programmatic counters for the .idl methods and attributes (via 
>>>>>> MeasureAs) 
>>>>>> are also included to track the stats for API usage. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Availability expectation Feature is available only in Isolated Web 
>>>>>> Apps on desktop platforms. 
>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5146307550248960 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Adoption expectation Expected to be used initially by a small number 
>>>>>> of developers inside Isolated Web Apps. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Adoption plan Working directly with developers that are planning to 
>>>>>> rely on the API. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Non-OSS dependencies 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does the feature depend on any code or APIs outside the Chromium open 
>>>>>> source repository and its open-source dependencies to function?
>>>>>> None 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sample links 
>>>>>> https://github.com/GoogleChromeLabs/telnet-client 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Estimated milestones 
>>>>>> Shipping on desktop 130 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anticipated spec changes 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat 
>>>>>> or interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github 
>>>>>> issues in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution 
>>>>>> may 
>>>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>>>> of 
>>>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>>>> None 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status 
>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/6398297361088512?gate=6732051726729216 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com>. 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>> send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/000000000000c7b248061f910247%40google.com
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/000000000000c7b248061f910247%40google.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CACBzDhv-M2OsMcRKnHsKsuQwHW5O2SDoavGj9uVr%3DFCKc7U2Cg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CACBzDhv-M2OsMcRKnHsKsuQwHW5O2SDoavGj9uVr%3DFCKc7U2Cg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohSKPm8tu-xSiEVnvgggte_zY_TnqRZenebkCP69iAyV7qA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohSKPm8tu-xSiEVnvgggte_zY_TnqRZenebkCP69iAyV7qA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/82541dfc-0611-4c6c-a1af-6249c9bc0a0an%40chromium.org
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/82541dfc-0611-4c6c-a1af-6249c9bc0a0an%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAEmk%3DMaHeCx4cFun1Ur%3DwwVE_J6kmhquXqjaLeU8xsSkzPtHNw%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAEmk%3DMaHeCx4cFun1Ur%3DwwVE_J6kmhquXqjaLeU8xsSkzPtHNw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/1f67c216-7a70-493c-9750-1fb64894cf3fn%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to