Hi Xiaocheng,
Thank you for digging in and scheduling time with Rob to discuss further.
However our policy
<https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features/#new-feature-prepare-to-ship>
is
not to delay launching features based on a desire for review and discussion
beyond one month from the point of formally soliciting feedback (Jan 9 in this
case <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1037#issue-2778216331>).
If there are specific concrete concerns (especially ones which might
credibly give rise to compatibility issues if fixed one or two months from
now), then we can discuss those and evaluate whether they warrant a delay.
But otherwise we should just continue to collaborate and explore making
changes post-ship.

As I know you well know, a new web feature (especially in the CSS space)
shipping in one engine is really still near the beginning of the process of
standards maturation and full interoperability. I trust Rob and his team to
continue to engage in alignment within the standards community and to
invest in additional changes as necessary for achieving wide
interoperability and full standardization.

Thanks,
   Rick

On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 10:20 AM Xiaocheng Hu <xiaochengh.w...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> (With my TAG hat on)
>
> Could the shipping of this feature be held until 3/18?
>
> We have discussed the Carousel-related features
> <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1037> at the TAG F2F and
> have some concerns. We've invited
> <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1037#issuecomment-2697802236>
>  flackr@ to our breakout meeting on 3/18 to help us resolve them.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Regards,
> Xiaocheng
>
> On Thursday, February 13, 2025 at 12:16:33 AM UTC+8 Robert Flack wrote:
>
>> Scroll drag with mouse is being discussed in
>> https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/512 with a potential API for
>> it.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 11:13 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <
>> yoav...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> LGTM3
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, February 12, 2025 at 5:13:29 PM UTC+1 Alex Russell wrote:
>>>
>> Sorry for missing the link to the TAG review. LGTM2, but would love an
>>>> update on scroll drag in some other channel.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, February 12, 2025 at 8:10:35 AM UTC-8 Alex Russell wrote:
>>>>
>>> Is there a link to the pending TAG review?
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, it's great to see inertness being added, but is there also a
>>>>> solution to click-grab dragging? This is notably missing from native
>>>>> carousel support on the web and I would have expected it to be proposed
>>>>> along with this; e.g. an extension that mirrors `touch-action: pan-x` but
>>>>> for mice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, February 12, 2025 at 7:39:51 AM UTC-8 Rick Byers wrote:
>>>>>
>>>> LGTM1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 5:28 PM 'Ajay Rahatekar' via blink-dev <
>>>>>> blin...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Contact emails
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> fla...@chromium.org, fut...@chromium.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Explainer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/flackr/carousel/tree/main/inert
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Specification
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui-4/#inertness
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/10956
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Summary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The interactivity property specifies whether an element and its flat
>>>>>>> tree descendants (including text runs) are inert or not.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Making an element inert affects whether it can be focused, edited,
>>>>>>> selected, and searchable by find-in-page. It also affects whether it is
>>>>>>> visible in the accessibility tree.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The syntax is: interactivity: auto | inert
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Blink component
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Blink>CSS
>>>>>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3ECSS%22>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TAG review
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1037
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TAG review status
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pending
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Risks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> None
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gecko: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1161
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WebKit: https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/447
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Web developers: Positive
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Other signals:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WebView application risks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based 
>>>>>>> applications?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> None
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Debuggability
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For the interactivity property, it is debuggable like any other
>>>>>>> keyword property in the styles related panes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The accessibility tree pane changes the inertness reason from "Inert
>>>>>>> element" and "Inert subtree" to only using "Inert element", where "Inert
>>>>>>> element" now means an element with interactivity computed to inert.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The reason is that the HTML inert attribute is now setting inertness
>>>>>>> through a UA rule for interactivity and can be escaped using the
>>>>>>> interactivity property, whereas previously an inert attribute would 
>>>>>>> force a
>>>>>>> whole subtree inert.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>>>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    interactivity-inert-click-002.html
>>>>>>>    <http://wpt.live/css/css-ui/interactivity-inert-click-002.html>
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    interactivity-inert-click.html
>>>>>>>    <http://wpt.live/css/css-ui/interactivity-inert-click.html>
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    interactivity-inert-find.html
>>>>>>>    <http://wpt.live/css/css-ui/interactivity-inert-find.html>
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    interactivity-inert-focus.html
>>>>>>>    <http://wpt.live/css/css-ui/interactivity-inert-focus.html>
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    interactivity-inert-fullscreen-ua.html
>>>>>>>    <http://wpt.live/css/css-ui/interactivity-inert-fullscreen-ua.html>
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    interactivity-inert-html-attribute-ua.html
>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>> <http://wpt.live/css/css-ui/interactivity-inert-html-attribute-ua.html>
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    interactivity-inert-modal-dialog-ua.html
>>>>>>>    <http://wpt.live/css/css-ui/interactivity-inert-modal-dialog-ua.html>
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    interactivity-computed.html
>>>>>>>    <http://wpt.live/css/css-ui/parsing/interactivity-computed.html>
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    interactivity.html
>>>>>>>    <http://wpt.live/css/css-ui/parsing/interactivity.html>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Flag name on about://flags
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #experimental-web-platform-features
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Finch feature name
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CSSInert
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Non-finch justification
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> None
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Requires code in //chrome?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> False
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Estimated milestones
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 135
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat
>>>>>>> or interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github
>>>>>>> issues in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution 
>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or 
>>>>>>> structure of
>>>>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> None
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5107436833472512?gate=5112515414196224
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Links to previous Intent discussions
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Intent to Prototype:
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/Xuo6HpkN1xQ
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To view this discussion visit
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAHB%2BDAjXdDs6n0pUK-8F%2BOyQNUoaesusgVSag%3DSp1NnyYhuxsQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAHB%2BDAjXdDs6n0pUK-8F%2BOyQNUoaesusgVSag%3DSp1NnyYhuxsQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY_ngyE%2BMP9%2BQU5t7pVVFH83QHsFZFvDRUZki13_ihz40w%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to