I see there are 3 LGTMs now, and I'm not going to block, but I want to be 
extremely clear that this is not precedent and that folks who have asked 
for this change should take note that I might block future changes of this 
sort if we see this kind of thing become a habit from the CSS WG.

Best,

Alex

On Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 12:53:13 PM UTC-7 jacka...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:21 AM Alex Russell <slightly...@chromium.org> 
> wrote:
> > Why would we change this? We backed the original intent with the usual 
> conditions: once the concrete is poured, it's done. I'm not inclined to 
> approve.
>
> That is not, as a general rule, how API owner approval is interpreted,
> or (as far as I know) intended. It also drastically conflicts with
> usual practice, which has substantial weight of precedent behind it -
> while we of course balance the cost of any changes with the benefits,
> we are generally *open* to changes requested by other implementors,
> particularly when we're the first to advance an API.
>
> In this particular case, the cost is virtually nil - it's a brand new
> API with minimal usage, and it's a change to a *default* keyword that
> would rarely be written explicitly anyway. (We only have it at all,
> rather than just relying on a keyword being absent, due to my own API
> design preferences, and the fact that it aids us with a small
> back-compat issue.) The benefit of "make other implementors happier
> with the API" definitely outweighs the costs here, by any reasonable
> metric.
>
> But even in more controversial/costly cases, I strongly contest the
> principle you're trying to establish here. We *do* make changes, even
> ones with compat pain, as part of our unofficial contract with other
> implementors, to make it more palatable to everyone when we push ahead
> faster than other implementors are comfortable with or capable of
> matching. It's always a judgement call, but it leans *much* further
> toward acceptance than "once Blink API owners approve, the concrete is
> poured" does.
>
> ~TJ
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/a13605c9-ab07-44e9-b181-2a8b310b7456n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to