On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 8:14 PM Evan Liu <ev...@google.com> wrote: > Thanks for the detailed feedback, Jeffrey! We'll discuss this at the Audio > Working Group meeting this week and I'll update this thread afterwards. > > Thanks, > Evan > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 9:08 PM Jeffrey Yasskin <jyass...@chromium.org> > wrote: > >> FYI, the TAG left comments at >> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1038#issuecomment-2803693504 >> . >> >> On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 10:22 AM Evan Liu <ev...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> Are you thinking it might be reasonable to ship in M128 (decide by >>>> branch on Apr 28, plan to merge any required changes before May 21)? >>> >>> That sounds like a reasonable target, assuming TAG doesn't propose any >>> significant changes. >>> >>> That said, if you want to, I'm supportive of shipping the unprefixing >>>> alone >>>> <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6422562> now, >>>> since you already proved to us that the unprefixed API is not an >>>> opportunity to make any breaking API changes. Do you prefer to decouple >>>> that, or just wait and get the whole bundle approved to ship together? >>>> >>> Either is fine with me! Would decoupling just be a matter of making the >>> changes, or would I need to create a separate Chrome Status entry, get >>> position statements, all of the approvals, etc.? If it's the former, we >>> might as well make the change now. Otherwise it might just be easier to >>> bundle everything together. >>> >> I'm OK with just shipping the unprefixing under this same intent without the extra paperwork, but also it's a bit simpler if we just keep it all lumped together as a bundle. I don't think there's any particular reason to unprefix before shipping on-device, is there?
> >>> Thanks, >>> Evan >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 6:51 AM Thomas Steiner <to...@google.com> wrote: >>> >>>> This all looks great to me! Are you thinking it might be reasonable to >>>>> ship in M128 (decide by branch on Apr 28, plan to merge any required >>>>> changes before May 21)? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Off by one, classic. I think you meant 1*3*8 here. I know it's obvious >>>> now, but someone might once look back at this in ten years from now and >>>> wonder… >>>> >>> Whoops, yes of course - thank you :-). > >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY_jNnHKdhBK5XXXnjtBM-Bg3PU%3DG1KxmPJ6zbM3f3KLdQ%40mail.gmail.com.
