LGTM3

On Tuesday, September 23, 2025 at 4:28:50 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote:

> LGTM2 (it took me a minute to realize this exposes the top frame origin to 
> the IDP, and offers a way for a site to control if the user sees 2 or 3 
> hostnames in the sign in UI).
> On 9/22/25 2:44 p.m., Alex Russell wrote:
>
> LGTM1
>
> On Thursday, September 18, 2025 at 6:08:13 AM UTC-7 Yi Gu wrote:
>
>> Hi Yoav,
>>
>> Yes, this is controlled by developers.
>>
>> Currently, when fetching the client metadata endpoint, the browser sends 
>> the API caller's origin and client ID to the IdP. With this proposal, if 
>> the API is called from within a cross-site iframe (and allowed by the 
>> embedder via a permissions policy), the browser will also send the top 
>> frame's origin to that endpoint. Upon receiving both origins, the IdP can 
>> choose to return a boolean in the response, indicating whether they want to 
>> call out the actual token destination in the browser UI.
>>
>> Yi
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 1:24 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Can you clarify what the web-exposed parts of this feature would be? Do 
>>> developers have control over which iframe would be presented in the UI 
>>> (either the RP developers or the IDP ones)?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 6:23 PM Chromestatus <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> *Contact emails*
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> *Explainer*
>>>> https://github.com/w3c-fedid/FedCM/issues/449#issuecomment-1515631336
>>>>
>>>> *Specification*
>>>> https://github.com/w3c-fedid/FedCM/pull/774 
>>>>
>>>> *Summary*
>>>> Currently, FedCM always shows the toplevel site in its UI. This works 
>>>> well when the iframe is conceptually first-party (e.g. foo.com may 
>>>> have an iframe foostatic.com, which is not meaningful to the user). 
>>>> But if the iframe is actually third-party, it would be better to make it 
>>>> possible to show the iframe origin in the UI so that the user better 
>>>> understands who they are sharing their credentials with. For example, a 
>>>> photo editor may be embedded in a book publishing web app and may want to 
>>>> let users access files they have previously stored with the photo editor. 
>>>> This proposal allows doing so. 
>>>>
>>>> *Blink component*
>>>> Blink>Identity>FedCM 
>>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3EIdentity%3EFedCM%22>
>>>>
>>>> *Web Feature ID*
>>>> fedcm <https://webstatus.dev/features/fedcm> 
>>>>
>>>> *Search tags*
>>>> fedcm <http:///features#tags:fedcm>, iframe 
>>>> <http:///features#tags:iframe>
>>>>
>>>> *TAG review*
>>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1136 
>>>>
>>>> *TAG review status*
>>>> Pending
>>>>
>>>> *Risks*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>>>> No compat risk as this is a purely additive feature. For interop, if 
>>>> other browsers adopt FedCM but do not implement this feature, their UI 
>>>> will 
>>>> just show the toplevel site instead of the iframe site. That is, the UI is 
>>>> not as good, but the user is still able to log in. 
>>>>
>>>> *Gecko*: No signal For incremental improvements to FedCM, Firefox has 
>>>> asked us not to file standards position, and they will instead provide 
>>>> feedback in the GitHub PR.. Firefox engineer "not willing to block this", 
>>>> https://github.com/w3c-fedid/FedCM/issues/725#issuecomment-3189376203
>>>>
>>>> *WebKit*: No signal Safari is not implementing FedCM in general. They 
>>>> have closed other position requests for specific FedCM additions as 
>>>> duplicates of the general FedCM position request, e.g. 
>>>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/120#issuecomment-1914040695
>>>>
>>>> *Web developers*: Positive This was requested by web developer 
>>>> partners. Our partners have tried out the Chrome implementation behind a 
>>>> flag and found it to match their expectations.
>>>>
>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>
>>>> *Ergonomics*
>>>> n/a
>>>>
>>>> *Activation*
>>>> No risk -- IDPs can simply look for the new request field and respond 
>>>> with the new response field without risk of breaking older releases or 
>>>> other browsers.
>>>>
>>>> *WebView application risks*
>>>>
>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? 
>>>> n/a, FedCM not supported in WebView 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Debuggability*
>>>> Same as other FedCM features. The network view in devtools would be 
>>>> especially helpful for debugging this feature. 
>>>>
>>>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, 
>>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>>>> NoFedCM in general is not supported on webview. Supported on all other 
>>>> blink platforms.
>>>>
>>>> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
>>>> Yes
>>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/fedcm/third-party-iframe?label=experimental&label=master
>>>>
>>>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>>>> FedCmIframeOrigin 
>>>>
>>>> *Finch feature name*
>>>> FedCmIframeOrigin 
>>>>
>>>> *Rollout plan*
>>>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>>>
>>>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>>>> True
>>>>
>>>> *Tracking bug*
>>>> https://crbug.com/390581529
>>>>
>>>> *Launch bug*
>>>> https://launch.corp.google.com/launch/4408324
>>>>
>>>> *Non-OSS dependencies*
>>>>
>>>> Does the feature depend on any code or APIs outside the Chromium open 
>>>> source repository and its open-source dependencies to function? none
>>>>
>>>> *Estimated milestones*
>>>> Shipping on desktop 142 
>>>> Shipping on Android 142 
>>>>
>>>> *Anticipated spec changes*
>>>>
>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
>>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues 
>>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>> of 
>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way). none
>>>>
>>>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5176474637959168?gate=6194078890983424
>>>>
>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>>>> <https://chromestatus.com>. 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/68c98f0b.050a0220.180098.04b2.GAE%40google.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/68c98f0b.050a0220.180098.04b2.GAE%40google.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>
>> To view this discussion visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohSKgL17FAqqRC%3DgukkmbyKA708KQzw956HvP1WGs73vUHw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohSKgL17FAqqRC%3DgukkmbyKA708KQzw956HvP1WGs73vUHw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
>
> To view this discussion visit 
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/50cae861-41c1-4707-94ea-fb39010a452fn%40chromium.org
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/50cae861-41c1-4707-94ea-fb39010a452fn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/b7cd7557-873e-4d1e-b81d-6e57f2abfb35n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to