LGTM3 with the chromestatus entry updated with the "Longer explanation"
text or a summary of it.

The "abnormal case" described indeed sounds unlikely, and if we're wrong
about this, we can use the kill switch.


On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 5:08 PM Chris Harrelson <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi, Please update the Interoperability and Compatibility of your
> Chromestatus entry to include the comments made here. Currently it says
> "none", which is not quite right.
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 7:24 AM Rick Byers <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Sounds low risk of compat issues to me and the WebRTC field trial system
>> should be sufficient to ensure any unexpected breakage can be quickly
>> mitigated.
>> LGTM2
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 10:33 AM Mike Taylor <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks both - that's helpful.
>>>
>>> LGTM1
>>> On 10/10/25 7:09 a.m., Philipp Hancke wrote:
>>>
>>> i'd expect the typical usage to be iterating over the extensions and
>>> setting the desired state for each one you care about without looking at
>>> the current state which should, fingers crossed, work just the same.
>>>
>>> Am Fr., 10. Okt. 2025 um 11:29 Uhr schrieb 'Harald Alvestrand' via
>>> blink-dev <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>> Longer explanation....
>>>>
>>>> This API has been used up to now to turn on behavior (in the form of
>>>> RTP header extensions) on the RTP connection that was shipped as
>>>> off-by-default. We don't believe that anyone has actively used it to turn
>>>> off features.
>>>> This usage should see no change (therefore no risk). What will change
>>>> is that when features that are on by default are turned off in negotiation,
>>>> they will remain off in subsequent negotiation rounds.
>>>> There are two normal cases I can think of, and one abnormal one:
>>>>
>>>> - The responder does not support the feature, and therefore always
>>>> replies with "feature off". Result is that it will not be turned on - no
>>>> change.
>>>> - The responder supports the feature, but has rejected it in initial
>>>> negotiation because it does not want to use it. In that case, under
>>>> previous behavior, it would have to respond to all subsequent negotiation
>>>> rounds by turning off the feature again. Under the new behavior, it will
>>>> already be off in the offer, so the result of turning it off again will not
>>>> make any difference - no change.
>>>>
>>>> The abnormal case:
>>>>
>>>> - The responder supports the feature, but has rejected it in initial
>>>> negotiation because it does not want to use it, but does not have code to
>>>> turn it off in subsequent negotiation (likely due to this code path not
>>>> being tested). In this case, the feature will presently turn on after a
>>>> subsequent round of negotiation despite being initially rejected. This is
>>>> not likely to be a desired behavior.
>>>>
>>>> So we think that this change brings no change to expected behavior for
>>>> current users, and if the hypothetical user that turns off features using
>>>> this API exists, it is more likely to fix an undetected bug in their code
>>>> than to introduce undesired behavior.
>>>>
>>>> Does that answer the question?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 2:54 PM Mike Taylor <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 10/7/25 8:39 a.m., 'Harald Alvestrand' via blink-dev wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> *Contact emails*
>>>>> [email protected], [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> *Specification*
>>>>>
>>>>> https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-extensions/#rtp-header-extension-control-modifications
>>>>>
>>>>> *Summary*
>>>>> Users of https://chromestatus.com/feature/5680189201711104 found that
>>>>> the API as specified was not ergonomic for subsequent offer/answer. The WG
>>>>> has adopted a revised behavior, merged to spec in
>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-extensions/pull/238, that ensures that
>>>>> subsequent offer/answer does not permute the header extensions negotiated
>>>>> unless the user wants that to happen.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Blink component*
>>>>> Blink>WebRTC>PeerConnection
>>>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3EWebRTC%3EPeerConnection%22>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Web Feature ID*
>>>>> webrtc <https://webstatus.dev/features/webrtc>
>>>>>
>>>>> *TAG review*
>>>>> None
>>>>>
>>>>> *TAG review status*
>>>>> Not applicable
>>>>>
>>>>> *Risks*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>>>>> None
>>>>>
>>>>> As a non WebRTC expert, could you help me understand what kind of risk
>>>>> this change might bring to applications relying on the current shipping
>>>>> behavior?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Gecko*: No signal
>>>>>
>>>>> *WebKit*: No signal
>>>>>
>>>>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>>>>
>>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>>
>>>>> *WebView application risks*
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>> Low risk. Protected by WebRTC field trial
>>>>> "WebRTC-HeaderExtensionNegotiateMemory".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Debuggability*
>>>>> No DevTools support needed. Existing webrtc-internals should be
>>>>> sufficient for debugging.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>>>>> Yes
>>>>>
>>>>> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
>>>>> Yes
>>>>> webrtc-extensions/RTCRtpTransceiver-headerExtensionControl.html will
>>>>> be affected by the spec change. A test update will be shipped together 
>>>>> with
>>>>> enabling the feature. wpt.fyi link:
>>>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/webrtc-extensions/RTCRtpTransceiver-headerExtensionControl.html
>>>>>
>>>>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>>>>> WebRTC-HeaderExtensionNegotiateMemory (WebRTC field trial)
>>>>>
>>>>> *Finch feature name*
>>>>> None
>>>>>
>>>>> *Non-finch justification*
>>>>> The change is in webrtc, so it uses WebRTC field trials which provide
>>>>> the same functionality as finch flags in practice (including the ability 
>>>>> to
>>>>> do Finch experiments/kill switches)
>>>>>
>>>>> *Rollout plan*
>>>>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>>>>
>>>>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>>>>> False
>>>>>
>>>>> *Tracking bug*
>>>>> https://issues.webrtc.org/439514253
>>>>>
>>>>> *Availability expectation*
>>>>> The base spec being modified is only available in Chromium browsers so
>>>>> far. Given support from other vendors in WG, we expect that when others
>>>>> ship this, they will conform to the modified spec.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Adoption expectation*
>>>>> Feature will be used by partners utilizing WebRTC advanced features.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Adoption plan*
>>>>> Feature will be used in the rollout of L4S congestion control in Meet,
>>>>> with other interactive video products expected to follow.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Estimated milestones*
>>>>> Shipping on desktop 144
>>>>> Shipping on Android 144
>>>>> Shipping on WebView 144
>>>>>
>>>>> *Anticipated spec changes*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> All spec changes merged.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5135528638939136?gate=5170761664954368
>>>>>
>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOqqYVGGxvwJcjsJ1gf3VzhoyOBHiQiqWpL15FUWWHjZS0m0jw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOqqYVGGxvwJcjsJ1gf3VzhoyOBHiQiqWpL15FUWWHjZS0m0jw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOqqYVGk6v_KV4DOpghk%3DKscgxMRA%3D%2BCd38%2B_JjjdCEMvXg8bA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOqqYVGk6v_KV4DOpghk%3DKscgxMRA%3D%2BCd38%2B_JjjdCEMvXg8bA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/d7d13930-0d66-40e8-a33c-d44bb30deaa7%40chromium.org
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/d7d13930-0d66-40e8-a33c-d44bb30deaa7%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY_6ArukOP2ohqgHf9pXu%3DgBctH4BYz-jBMNizCN%2Bn5Yxg%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY_6ArukOP2ohqgHf9pXu%3DgBctH4BYz-jBMNizCN%2Bn5Yxg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw_-P%3DFNn3%3DA9yX5oP37TAh4_JA4YqnHNzgkbyxJodLckQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw_-P%3DFNn3%3DA9yX5oP37TAh4_JA4YqnHNzgkbyxJodLckQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAARdPYfeXS8i0Z58Zitn3CXenfEW8-uyn_iDR1HhYSDaBDE_SA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to