On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 2:19 PM 'Nicolás Peña Moreno' via blink-dev <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Responding for Suresh since he's OOO this week. We have UKM metrics that
> tell us which IDPs would break today due to this change. We plan to
> document this change through our public devrel outreach and also reach out
> to IDPs that we detected through our metrics. While the number of sites
> that would break today due to this is relatively high, the number of IDPs
> is fairly small, so we are confident we can deploy once we know it would
> cause no breakage.
>

Except we've now had at least one web compat incident due to a major RP who
doesn't depend on an IDP-served SDK, right?

On Friday, October 17, 2025 at 1:04:59 PM UTC-4 [email protected] wrote:
>
>>
>> On 10/17/25 10:41 a.m., suresh potti wrote:
>>
>> Contact emails
>>
>> [email protected] Specification
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c-fedid/FedCM/pull/760 Summary To address
>> cross-site identity correlation risks in the FedCM API, Identity Providers
>> (IdPs) that utilize client_metadata within their FedCM configuration are
>> required to implement the direct endpoints format in the
>> .well-known/web-identity file. This mandate ensures that both
>> accounts_endpoint and login_url are explicitly defined whenever a
>> client_metadata_endpoint is present. This approach strengthens privacy
>> protections by preventing relying parties from exploiting metadata to
>> correlate user identities across multiple sites. For further details and
>> discussion, refer to https://github.com/w3c-fedid/FedCM/issues/700.
>>
>> Migration Plan Chrome will enforce this rule in two phases:
>>
>> Chrome 143 (Warning Phase): If client_metadata_endpoint exists but
>> accounts_endpoint or login_url is missing, the browser will display
>> console warnings. This gives IdPs time to update configurations.
>>
>> Chrome 145 (Enforcement Phase): The requirement becomes mandatory. FedCM
>> configurations missing these endpoints will be blocked, preventing
>> authentication flows.
>>
>> Does this apply to both passive mode and active mode? "Preventing
authentication flows" for passive mode seems like a completely trivial severity
of breakage
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RC-pBBvsazYfCNNUSkPqAVpSpNJ96U8trhNkfV0v9fk/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.u5ya6jvru7dl>
since
it just means an optional extra UI doesn't show up. But any breakage for
active mode (where a user has just clicked on a "sign-in") button seems
very serious. So if the latter, I think we'd want to see UseCounter data
proving that the usage has been migrated before approving a breaking change.

> Blink component
>>
>> Blink>Identity>FedCM
>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3EIdentity%3EFedCM%22>
>>
>> Web Feature ID
>>
>> fedcm <https://webstatus.dev/features/fedcm>
>>
>> TAG review
>>
>> None
>>
>> Risks
>>
>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>
>> IdPs failing to update .well-known/web-identity for FedCM client metadata
>> risk breaking authentication flows. Chrome 143 issues warnings, but
>> starting Chrome 145, missing accounts_endpoint or login_url will block
>> configurations entirely. Immediate migration is critical to maintain
>> compatibility and avoid service disruptions for relying parties and
>> end-users.
>>
>> Similar to the previous email, can you say something about expected
>> impact/usage here? And how confident are we that IdPs are going to be
>> paying attention to console warnings?
>>
>> Gecko: No signal (Firefox does not wish to support the client metadata
>> endpoint of the FedCM API so this would not be a change applicable to them)
>> WebKit: No signal Web developers: No signals Other signals:
>>
>> WebView application risks
>>
>> FedCM does not work in WebView.
>>
>> Ongoing technical constraints
>>
>> None
>>
>> Debuggability
>>
>> Same as other FedCM features. The network view in devtools would be
>> especially helpful for debugging this feature.
>>
>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
>> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>>
>> No, FedCM in general is not supported on webview. Supported on all other
>> blink platforms.
>>
>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>> ?
>>
>> Yes
>> https://wpt.fyi/results/fedcm/fedcm-well-known-validation?label=experimental&label=master
>>
>> Flag name on about://flags
>>
>> fedcm-well-known-endpoint-validation
>>
>> Finch feature name
>>
>> FedCmWellKnownEndpointValidation
>>
>> Requires code in //chrome?
>>
>> False
>>
>> Estimated milestones
>>
>> Shipping on desktop
>>
>> 145
>>
>> Shipping on Android
>>
>> 145
>>
>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>
>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/4614417052467200
>>
>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/bb953b88-ddd6-4d4d-9d7a-f1384dae2511n%40chromium.org
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/bb953b88-ddd6-4d4d-9d7a-f1384dae2511n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/27918dd1-04ae-4e90-9daf-22fb8f27b6f4n%40chromium.org
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/27918dd1-04ae-4e90-9daf-22fb8f27b6f4n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY9-A%3DKmyXs4OfYhPyDDWmQP21mmPXAuN0xovq_kH1yfHg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to