Thanks Pâris for your feedback!

Previously we sent out an I2P
<https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/rwu9wFl0mF4/m/bikJ9wIjAQAJ?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
for delegated FedCM and landed some relevant patches. As mentioned in that
I2P, some components could be beneficial to the web as standalone features
so we have been thinking to decouple them from the initial I2P. Regrettably
the explainer I linked in this I2P does include obsolete information. I'll
update it with the suggestions and ping the thread when that's done.


Yi

On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 4:44 AM Pâris Meuleman <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Unless I'm missing something, the linked "specification" (Issue #694
> <http://github.com/w3c-fedid/FedCM/issues/694>) for FedCM Conditional
> Mediation is too vague for a security review.
>
> Please provide a clear spec that consolidates the feature's behavior,
> specifically  addressing:
>
>    1.
>
>    Trust & Verification: Are the attributes used to fill inputs (e.g.,
>    email) considered verified by the IdP? If so, how does the browser and RP
>    verify them (e.g., claims check, origin match) to ensure they can be
>    trusted (potentially replacing site-level verification)?
>    2.
>
>    IdP Calls & Timing: When are calls made to the IdP? Does the FedCM
>    exchange complete before or after the autofill suggestion is displayed?
>    3.
>
>    Data Communication: How is the verified data communicated back to the
>    website (e.g., Promise resolve, HTMLInputElement value update)?
>
> I see there was already some prototyping back in April?
> crrev.com/c/6393877
>
> Thanks, Paris (Security Reviewer)
> On Thursday, November 13, 2025 at 1:02:26 AM UTC+1 Chromestatus wrote:
>
>> *Contact emails*
>> [email protected], [email protected]
>>
>> *Explainer*
>> https://github.com/w3c-fedid/FedCM/issues/694
>>
>> *Specification*
>> https://github.com/w3c-fedid/FedCM/issues/694
>>
>> *Summary*
>> By supporting conditional mediation from the Credential Management API
>> for FedCM, we can enhance autofill capabilities with identity attributes
>> sourced from identity providers via a FedCM conditional request.
>>
>> *Blink component*
>> Blink>Identity>FedCM
>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3EIdentity%3EFedCM%22>
>>
>> *Web Feature ID*
>> fedcm <https://webstatus.dev/features/fedcm>
>>
>> *Motivation*
>> Input fields configured with autocomplete='webauthn' currently support
>> Passkey's conditional mediation. Because users may also create accounts
>> using federated credentials, exploring the augmentation of credential
>> autofill with federated accounts presents an opportunity to mitigate
>> account duplication.
>>
>> *Initial public proposal*
>> https://github.com/w3c-fedid/FedCM/issues/694
>>
>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>> True
>>
>> *Tracking bug*
>> https://crbug.com/410533051
>>
>> *Estimated milestones*
>>
>> No milestones specified
>>
>>
>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/6471145475538944?gate=5701923141058560
>>
>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>> <https://chromestatus.com>.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFvKR3kGZmDsWDywn_QL6C%3DF3VC5tRDGC%2BsQ6AByfkqBpmgAZQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to