Great, that text clearly covers capabilities exposed by this API.

LGTM2

Thanks,
Vlad

On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 12:53 PM Alex Cooper <[email protected]> wrote:

> > That great! Do you know what the permission text says? Or do you know
> where I might find that?
> The feature is currently only available in AR, the text is here:
> https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:components/permissions_strings.grdp;drc=69a52d206707526e6493c093d618f8778e9ddef0;l=24,
> and has been discussed extensively with the privacy team regarding exactly
> these types of data.
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 6:36 AM Vladimir Levin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, February 11, 2026 at 12:46:47 PM UTC-5 Alexander Cooper
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Is this explainer up to date?
>>
>> For all intents and purposes yes. There's maybe a couple of minor
>> additions from the spec that could be added to the explainer, but I don't
>> think anything represents a critical lack in the explainer or anything like
>> that.
>>
>> > Looks like the TAG reviewed this back in 2021: https://github.com/
>> w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/620
>> > Can you update the Chromestatus entry to include the review?
>> > Has anything significant changed with the feature since then?
>>
>> I've asked this question before and never gotten a satisfactory answer,
>> but the chromestatus tool does not seem to have a spot to put a TAG review
>> entry, just the questions regarding it. It looks like there have been minor
>> additions, namely the `semanticLabel` attribute as well as the
>> `initiateRoomCapture` method. It is worth noting however that these
>> features are also launched in the Meta Quest browser already, so I think it
>> unlikely that any TAG feedback would reasonably be able to be addressed
>> without breaking existing experiences.
>>
>> > Hey, just a question about privacy: am I correct in assuming that this
>> would provide additional information about the user's environment to the
>> site? Presumably given this API, the site would be able to construct a
>> loose representation of the user's room/house. Is this new information or
>> is this already available to the site via other APIs? I think this is gated
>> behind a permission, but I wonder whether the implications of this are
>> captured in the permission text for the user to understand.
>>
>> The privacy team has approved this launch and previously reviewed the
>> permission that this is under. As noted on the Privacy gate on the
>> Chromestatus entry, similar data is exposed by both the hit-test and
>> depth-sensing WebXR APIs, all of which require the same permission prompt.
>>
>>
>> That great! Do you know what the permission text says? Or do you know
>> where I might find that?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vlad
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 8:25 AM Vladimir Levin <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hey, just a question about privacy: am I correct in assuming that this
>> would provide additional information about the user's environment to the
>> site? Presumably given this API, the site would be able to construct a
>> loose representation of the user's room/house. Is this new information or
>> is this already available to the site via other APIs? I think this is gated
>> behind a permission, but I wonder whether the implications of this are
>> captured in the permission text for the user to understand.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Vlad
>>
>> On Wednesday, February 11, 2026 at 11:19:51 AM UTC-5 Alex Russell wrote:
>>
>> LGTM1, assuming other questions are answered.
>>
>> On Wednesday, February 11, 2026 at 8:19:24 AM UTC-8 Daniel Bratell wrote:
>>
>> Is this explainer up to date?
>>
>> https://github.com/immersive-web/plane-detection/blob/main/explainer.md
>>
>> /Daniel
>> On 2026-02-10 22:44, Chromestatus wrote:
>>
>> *Contact emails*
>> [email protected]
>>
>> *Specification*
>> https://immersive-web.github.io/plane-detection
>>
>> *Summary*
>> The WebXR Plane Detection API allows sites to retrieve the set of planes
>> detected in the user's environment. This is both less work for developers
>> and more powerful than using the depth-sensing WebXR feature as planes such
>> as walls that are occluded by objects can still be fully represented if the
>> system is aware of the boundaries of the wall. (Whereas a depth map would
>> show the wall, but it would be broken up by any objects in front of the
>> wall, potentially obscuring the full scope of the wall). Further, semantic
>> labeling information is exposed where the device is aware of such labels
>> and they fit into predefined categories, allowing better knowledge about
>> the world.
>>
>> *Blink component*
>> Blink>WebXR
>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3EWebXR%22>
>>
>> *Web Feature ID*
>> Missing feature
>>
>> *Motivation*
>> *No information provided*
>>
>> *Initial public proposal*
>> *No information provided*
>>
>> *TAG review*
>> *No information provided*
>>
>> *TAG review status*
>> Issues addressed
>>
>> *Risks*
>>
>>
>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>> *No information provided*
>>
>> *Gecko*: Defer (https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/
>> issues/1346) Presumptive Defer due to that being the state of all other
>> WebXR positions due to current lack of support/development.
>>
>> *WebKit*: No signal (https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/
>> issues/608)
>>
>> *Web developers*: Positive
>>
>> *Other signals*:
>>
>> *WebView application risks*
>>
>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that
>> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>> *No information provided*
>>
>>
>> *Debuggability*
>> *No information provided*
>>
>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
>> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>> No
>> WebXR itself is only support on Android and Windows, and not on Android
>> WebView. This will be supported on all platforms, but primary usage is
>> expected to be on Android.
>>
>> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
>> Yes
>> https://wpt.fyi/results/webxr/plane-detection?label=
>> experimental&label=master&aligned Infrastructure issues exist on
>> wpt.fyi, but tests do pass within Chromium CQ
>>
>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>> webxr-plane-detection
>>
>> *Finch feature name*
>> WebXRPlaneDetection
>>
>> *Rollout plan*
>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>
>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>> False
>>
>> *Tracking bug*
>> https://crbug.com/394636076
>>
>> *Estimated milestones*
>> Shipping on desktop 147 Shipping on Android 147
>>
>> *Anticipated spec changes*
>>
>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of
>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>> *No information provided*
>>
>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5177993049800704?gate=6532572282748928
>>
>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>> <https://chromestatus.com>.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/
>> chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/698ba6cd.2b0a0220.24bcd6.
>> 0811.GAE%40google.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/698ba6cd.2b0a0220.24bcd6.0811.GAE%40google.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CADsXd2MkEuiMEj2j2VAm-G6uoB%3DKLSs%2Bfmpd1hU%2Bx%2BK%2BJx6uZQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to