On Thursday, February 19, 2026 at 2:01:57 PM UTC+1 Steve Kobes wrote:

*Contact emails*
[email protected], [email protected]

*Explainer*
https://github.com/WICG/view-transitions/blob/main/scoped-transitions.md

*Specification*
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-view-transitions-2

*Design docs*
https://github.com/WICG/view-transitions/blob/main/scoped-transitions.md

*Summary*
Exposes element.startViewTransition() on arbitrary HTML elements. The 
element establishes a scope for the transition, which means that the 
transition pseudo-elements are affected by ancestor clips and transforms, 
and multiple transitions on separate elements can run concurrently.

*Blink component*
Blink>CSS 
<https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3ECSS%22>

*Web Feature ID*
view-transitions-element-scoped 
<https://webstatus.dev/features/view-transitions-element-scoped>

*Motivation*
View transitions are currently a "global" document-level concept, which 
means components cannot use transitions without sacrificing composability. 
For more details, see the explainer.

*Initial public proposal*
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9890

*TAG review*
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1188

*TAG review status*
Issues addressed

*Risks*


*Interoperability and Compatibility*
No compatibility risk as this is a new API. Some interoperability risk due 
to lack of signals from other browsers. See requests for standards 
positions from WebKit / Firefox below.

*Gecko*: No signal (https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/
issues/1352)

*WebKit*: No signal (https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/
issues/611)

*Web developers*: Positive (https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9890#
issuecomment-1927179371) Top feature request from surveyed web authors re. 
"what is missing from View Transitions".

*Other signals*: "I'm salivating." - https://bsky.app/profile/
samwho.dev/post/3mf52aozscc24

*Ergonomics*
None.

*Activation*
None.

*Security*
Scoped view transitions introduces no new security risks. Security 
considerations applicable to view transitions in general are described at: 
https://www.w3.org/TR/css-view-transitions/#sec Scoped view transitions are 
only for same-document (SPA) transitions, and do not affect cross-document 
(MPA) transitions.

*WebView application risks*

None. This feature does not deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs.


*Debuggability*
DevTools supports inspecting the transition pseudo-tree and pausing / 
scrubbing the transition animations from the Animations tab. These features 
work in the same way for both document-scoped and element-scoped view 
transitions.

*Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, 
Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
Yes
Supported on all Blink platforms.

*Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
<https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
Yes
WPT directory: css/css-view-transitions/scoped Dashboard link: 
https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-view-transitions/scoped?label=experimental&;
label=master&aligned

*DevTrial instructions*
https://github.com/WICG/view-transitions/blob/main/scoped-
transitions.md#how-to-use

*Flag name on about://flags*
enable-experimental-web-platform-features

*Finch feature name*
ScopedViewTransitions

*Rollout plan*
Will ship enabled for all users

*Requires code in //chrome?*
False

*Tracking bug*
https://issues.chromium.org/issues/394052227

*Measurement*
Usage is measured by the web feature "ViewTransitionsElementScoped": 
https://chromestatus.com/metrics/webfeature/timeline/popularity/281

*Estimated milestones*
Shipping on desktop147DevTrial on desktop140Shipping on Android147DevTrial 
on Android140Shipping on WebView147

*Anticipated spec changes*

There is an issue open for the CSS WG to resolve on the name of the 
containment API, which is currently "view-transition-scope: auto": 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13123


Hmm, how long would it take to paint this particular bikeshed? Is there a 
risk of bake-in name-wise?
 


*Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
https://chromestatus.com/feature/5109852273377280?gate=6229325701185536

*Links to previous Intent discussions*
Intent to Prototype: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/
msgid/blink-dev/67abaada.2b0a0220.1b0c0.01f4.GAE%40google.com
Ready for Trial: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-
dev/c/kafnCyjDMrw/m/4XkuFmk7BgAJ


This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
<https://chromestatus.com/>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/33f1cba2-5e18-42d0-a48a-576ed148239fn%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to