LGTM3 also pending those other reviews.

On Monday, February 23, 2026 at 11:40:43 AM UTC-8 [email protected] 
wrote:

> LGTM2 pending the various reviews Mike requested.
>
> Best,
>
> Alex
>
> On Friday, February 20, 2026 at 11:16:22 AM UTC-8 Vladimir Levin wrote:
>
>> LGTM1. I'm mildly disappointed that we don't have some cool line 
>> preserving algorithm for this, but that shouldn't prevent us from 
>> supporting the keyword. :)
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Vlad
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 12:41 PM Gregg Tavares <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 10:51 PM TAMURA, Kent <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 4:54 AM Chromestatus <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> *Contact emails*
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> *Specification*
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.w3.org/TR/css-images/#ref-for-valdef-image-rendering-crisp-edges
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>> *Design docs*
>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>> https://www.w3.org/TR/css-images/#valdef-image-rendering-crisp-edges
>>>>>
>>>>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/Reference/Properties/image-rendering#crisp-edges
>>>>>
>>>>> *Summary*
>>>>> "image-rendering: crisp-edges" indicates that image should be scaled 
>>>>> in a way that preserves contrast and edges, and which avoids smoothing 
>>>>> colors or introducing blur to the image in the process Note: spec wise 
>>>>> this 
>>>>> is technically different than 'pixelated'. In actual implementations it 
>>>>> is 
>>>>> not. Spec wise 'pixelated' = use any process the UA wants to make the 
>>>>> result look pixelated. nearest-neighbor is acceptable. 'crisp-edges' = 
>>>>> use 
>>>>> any process you want that preserves contrast, edges, and avoids blending 
>>>>> colors, nearest-neighbor is acceptable. Both Firefox and Safari use treat 
>>>>> both as synonym and use nearest-neighbor for both. 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> So how does it work in Chromium?  Is `crisp-edges` same as `pixelated` 
>>>> like Firfox and Safari, or is it different from `pixelated`?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, it's effectively a synonym for 'pixelated', same as Safari and 
>>> Firefox
>>>  
>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>> *Blink component*
>>>>> Blink>CSS 
>>>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3ECSS%22>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Web Feature ID*
>>>>> image-rendering <https://webstatus.dev/features/image-rendering> 
>>>>>
>>>>> *Motivation*
>>>>> *No information provided* 
>>>>>
>>>>> *Initial public proposal*
>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Search tags*
>>>>> image-rendering <http:///features#tags:image-rendering>, crisp-edges 
>>>>> <http:///features#tags:crisp-edges>, pixelated 
>>>>> <http:///features#tags:pixelated>
>>>>>
>>>>> *TAG review*
>>>>> *No information provided* 
>>>>>
>>>>> *TAG review status*
>>>>> Not applicable 
>>>>>
>>>>> *Risks*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>>>>> image-rendering:crisp-edges support has been shipping in Safari since 
>>>>> 2016 and Firefox since 2019 
>>>>>
>>>>> *Gecko*: Shipped/Shipping (
>>>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1496617)
>>>>>
>>>>> *WebKit*: Shipped/Shipping (
>>>>> https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/commit/31e3ae4099568fbdc594a95d9de4f7c226a8ded0
>>>>> )
>>>>>
>>>>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>>>>
>>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>>
>>>>> *WebView application risks*
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? 
>>>>> *No information provided* 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Debuggability*
>>>>> *No information provided* 
>>>>>
>>>>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, 
>>>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>>>>> Yes
>>>>>
>>>>> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
>>>>> Yes 
>>>>>
>>>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-images/parsing/image-rendering-computed.html
>>>>>  
>>>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-images/parsing/image-rendering-valid.html 
>>>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-typed-om/the-stylepropertymap/properties/image-rendering.html
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>>>>> *No information provided* 
>>>>>
>>>>> *Finch feature name*
>>>>> *No information provided* 
>>>>>
>>>>> *Non-finch justification*
>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Rollout plan*
>>>>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>>>>
>>>>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>>>>> False
>>>>>
>>>>> *Tracking bug*
>>>>> https://issues.chromium.org/issues/41073066
>>>>>
>>>>> *Estimated milestones*
>>>>> Shipping on desktop 148 
>>>>> Shipping on Android 148 
>>>>> Shipping on WebView 148 
>>>>>
>>>>> *Anticipated spec changes*
>>>>>
>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
>>>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github 
>>>>> issues 
>>>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
>>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>>> of 
>>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way). 
>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5172217778405376?gate=6536836396744704
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Please ask for reviews of Privacy, WP Security, Enterprise, 
>>>> Debuggability, Testing.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sure, I wrongly assumed, as a tiny change with no new functionality, 
>>> just a synonym for an existing feature that's been shipping over 7 years in 
>>> other browsers would be uncontroversial. My bad.
>>>  
>>>
>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com>. 
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/69976a56.050a0220.18866f.02fd.GAE%40google.com
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/69976a56.050a0220.18866f.02fd.GAE%40google.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> TAMURA Kent 
>>>> Software Engineer, Google 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to [email protected].
>>>
>> To view this discussion visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAKZ%2BBNrEuKrjqoCE230DVQEa8%2BLou%2BP99UeN9Ri%3DGHZ20DBzsg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAKZ%2BBNrEuKrjqoCE230DVQEa8%2BLou%2BP99UeN9Ri%3DGHZ20DBzsg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/a9cf1142-9d89-475d-8026-530d8a04c8c5n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to