A random thought: I don't know that we're going to get great data from 
other vendors, rather than web developers directly.

Thomas, Patrick: any chance we can use the various browser devrel bat 
signals to ask developers if they'd like/hate this addition?

Best,

Alex

On Thursday, February 26, 2026 at 10:16:19 PM UTC-8 Philip Jägenstedt wrote:

> For a small addition to an existing API, developer signals are often not 
> as easy to come by, in particular it's not going to come up in surveys and 
> https://github.com/web-platform-dx/developer-signals doesn't track at 
> this granularity.
>
> You can look for the discussion that occurred when the spec change was 
> made. These issues and PRs seem relevant:
> https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1167
> https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/685
> https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1280
>
> "Developers want to simply know if a navigation was due to reload or 
> back/forward" makes sense, but do you know what developers have been doing 
> to work around this all these years?
>
> I think the main risk is that this has been sitting idle in the spec for 
> so long and nobody has given it any thought recently. Letting the standards 
> positions sit for a week or two to get some reactions would be good.
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 6:02 AM Helmut Januschka <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
>> asking for standard positions:
>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1360
>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/620
>>
>> not sure how to get "developer signal"
>>
>>
>> [email protected] schrieb am Dienstag, 17. Februar 2026 um 20:08:25 
>> UTC+1:
>>
>>> On 2/14/26 5:48 p.m., Helmut Januschka wrote:
>>>
>>> hello olli,
>>> sorry, messed up the entry, fixed it
>>>
>>> Looking at the chromestatus entry - it now shows "No Signal" for both. 
>>> Can we request Signals? 
>>>
>>>
>>> Am Sa., 14. Feb. 2026 um 22:56 Uhr schrieb Smaug <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> *> Gecko*: Shipped/Shipping
>>>>
>>>> *> WebKit*: Shipped/Shipping
>>>>
>>>> Is that correct given the following.
>>>> Gecko:
>>>>
>>>> https://searchfox.org/firefox-main/rev/c3797cdebac1316dd7168e995e3468c5a597e8d1/dom/webidl/Request.webidl#17
>>>>
>>>> Webkit:
>>>>
>>>> https://searchfox.org/wubkat/rev/db628492e5f463663cc3c393dfdd3a641f23d8f8/Source/WebCore/Modules/fetch/FetchRequest.idl#36-37,54
>>>>
>>>> and 
>>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/service-workers/service-worker/fetch-event.https.html?label=experimental&label=master&aligned
>>>>
>>>> -Olli
>>>> On Saturday, February 14, 2026 at 11:33:29 PM UTC+2 [email protected] 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> *Contact emails*
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> *Specification*
>>>>> https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-request-isreloadnavigation
>>>>>
>>>>> *Summary*
>>>>> Adds the read-only boolean attribute isReloadNavigation to the Fetch 
>>>>> API's Request interface. This attribute indicates whether the current 
>>>>> navigation request was initiated as a user-triggered reload (e.g., using 
>>>>> the refresh button, location.reload(), or history.go(0)). This signal is 
>>>>> primarily exposed on the Request object within a Service Worker's 
>>>>> FetchEvent. 
>>>>> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7137783
>>>>>
>>>>> *Blink component*
>>>>> Blink>Network 
>>>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3ENetwork%22>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Web Feature ID*
>>>>> network-information 
>>>>> <https://webstatus.dev/features/network-information>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Motivation*
>>>>> Web developers, particularly those implementing Service Worker caching 
>>>>> logic, currently lack a reliable, standardized way to distinguish between 
>>>>> a 
>>>>> regular navigation (forward/back) and a user-initiated reload. This 
>>>>> capability is crucial for implementing sophisticated and efficient 
>>>>> caching 
>>>>> strategies, such as bypassing the cache or enforcing a Network-First 
>>>>> strategy specifically during a reload to ensure the user gets the 
>>>>> freshest 
>>>>> content. This attribute standardizes the mechanism required by the Fetch 
>>>>> spec.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Initial public proposal*
>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>
>>>>> *TAG review*
>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>
>>>>> *TAG review status*
>>>>> Not applicable
>>>>>
>>>>> *Risks*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>>>>> Low Risk: The feature is additive. It introduces a new, read-only 
>>>>> property to the existing Request interface, meaning it does not change 
>>>>> the 
>>>>> behavior or signature of any existing methods or properties. Existing web 
>>>>> content that does not reference isReloadNavigation will continue to 
>>>>> function exactly as before.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Gecko*: Shipped/Shipping
>>>>>
>>>>> *WebKit*: Shipped/Shipping
>>>>>
>>>>> *Web developers*: Strongly positive
>>>>>
>>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>>
>>>>> *WebView application risks*
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Debuggability*
>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, 
>>>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>>>>> No
>>>>>
>>>> Where will it be supported? 
>>>
>>>
>>>>> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
>>>>> No
>>>>>
>>>> There seems to be some test coverage. What's missing? 
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *DevTrial instructions*
>>>>> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7137783
>>>>>
>>>>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Finch feature name*
>>>>> RequestIsReloadNavigation
>>>>>
>>>>> *Rollout plan*
>>>>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>>>>
>>>>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>>>>> False
>>>>>
>>>>> *Tracking bug*
>>>>> https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40487194
>>>>>
>>>>> *Estimated milestones*
>>>>> Shipping on desktop 146 
>>>>> Shipping on Android 146 
>>>>> Shipping on WebView 146 
>>>>> Shipping on iOS 146 
>>>>>
>>>>> *Anticipated spec changes*
>>>>>
>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
>>>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github 
>>>>> issues 
>>>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
>>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>>> of 
>>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5154214529597440?gate=6489806081228800
>>>>>
>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFmjHKSe3X8b_JA_n6r%3DddFXU7dkEmxLbKGqDshc3K-KaYtLRw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFmjHKSe3X8b_JA_n6r%3DddFXU7dkEmxLbKGqDshc3K-KaYtLRw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "blink-dev" group.
>>
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/4a305b81-ce9b-4748-b813-a12dd57c11bdn%40chromium.org
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/4a305b81-ce9b-4748-b813-a12dd57c11bdn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/ce566ba9-41bc-4023-8fab-ae1abc1bd587n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to