Note: This is being pushed back to M150, but retains the same
goals/platforms as before.

~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/They're)


On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 8:01 AM Daniel Bratell <[email protected]> wrote:

> LGTM3
>
> /Daniel
> On 2026-05-04 21:06, Chris Harrelson wrote:
>
> LGTM2
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2026 at 11:56 AM 'Dan Clark' via blink-dev <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> It looks like Safari is failing a couple of the new tests:
>> https://wpt.fyi/results/svg/styling?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=svg-filter-render
>> But they seem to fail because the image isn't rendered rather than
>> because the blur is being applied. So maybe this is a test issue, rather
>> than an indication that Safari hasn't shipped the behavior?
>>
>>
>> On Monday, May 4, 2026 at 11:39:27 AM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> LGTM1 under the condition we have good tests for this case and updated
>>> spec text (even if it's a PR).
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, April 29, 2026 at 8:34:58 AM UTC-7 Ari Chivukula wrote:
>>>
>>>> These just got picked upstream so results might take a bit:
>>>> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/59522
>>>>
>>>> I consider this a security fix with some room for alternate solutions
>>>> (e.g., restricting the set of SVG filters allowed instead of blocking all
>>>> of them), but a real need to patch in the meantime.
>>>>
>>>> ~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/They're)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 11:21 AM Philip Jägenstedt <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>> Hi Ari,
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you link the tests on wpt.fyi? Using part of the pattern you
>>>>> provided,
>>>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=svg-filter-render
>>>>> does not list any tests. I'm looking to see if the tests already pass in
>>>>> Safari as you'd expect if they're already shipping this behavior.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/13846 was opened only
>>>>> yesterday, has there been any discussion in the CSSWG? Or would you
>>>>> consider this a bugfix without much room for different solutions?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Philip
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 4:06 PM Chromestatus <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>> *Contact emails*
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Explainer*
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Specification*
>>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/13846
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Summary*
>>>>>> This launch prevents SVG filters from being applied to
>>>>>> cross-origin/restricted iframes (e.g., sandboxed ones) and embedded 
>>>>>> plugins
>>>>>> (e.g., pdfs). When a frame/plugin would be painted with an SVG filter
>>>>>> effect, the effect tree is traversed to find the highest ancestor without
>>>>>> SVG filters, and that effect is then applied instead.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Blink component*
>>>>>> Blink>SVG
>>>>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3ESVG%22>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Web Feature ID*
>>>>>> svg-filters <https://webstatus.dev/features/svg-filters>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Motivation*
>>>>>> SVG clickjacking (https://lyra.horse/blog/2025/12/svg-clickjacking/)
>>>>>> is a new spin on clickjacking which uses dynamic SVG filters to disguise
>>>>>> content and manipulate users into taking actions they might not 
>>>>>> otherwise.
>>>>>> Additionally, we would like to further restrict timing attacks (
>>>>>> https://media.blackhat.com/us-13/US-13-Stone-Pixel-Perfect-Timing-Attacks-with-HTML5-WP.pdf)
>>>>>> involving SVG filters.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Initial public proposal*
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *TAG review*
>>>>>> Not applicable, this isn’t adding a new feature but disabling one we
>>>>>> perhaps should not have supported.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *TAG review status*
>>>>>> Not applicable
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Goals for experimentation*
>>>>>> None
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Risks*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Gecko*: Under consideration (
>>>>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1395) Currently
>>>>>> allows SVG filters on all iframes/plugins.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *WebKit*: Shipped/Shipping (
>>>>>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/654) Currently
>>>>>> disables SVG filters on plugins and cross-origin iframes, but allows them
>>>>>> on same-origin iframes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *WebView application risks*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Debuggability*
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>> This impacts all platforms using blink.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>> svg/styling/svg-filter-render-*.tentative.https.html provides
>>>>>> cross-browser reference tests.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Finch feature name*
>>>>>> kPreventSvgFilterPaint
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Rollout plan*
>>>>>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>>>>>> False
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Tracking bug*
>>>>>> https://crbug.com/476646486
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Launch bug*
>>>>>> https://launch.corp.google.com/launch/4470371
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Measurement*
>>>>>> Existing counters track usage:
>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/5828
>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/5829
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Estimated milestones*
>>>>>> Shipping on desktop 149
>>>>>> Shipping on Android 149
>>>>>> Shipping on WebView 149
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Anticipated spec changes*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat
>>>>>> or interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github
>>>>>> issues in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5117170452398080?gate=4730771102367744
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com>.
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> To view this discussion visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/69f0bef1.050a0220.3ab19.0360.GAE%40google.com
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/69f0bef1.050a0220.3ab19.0360.GAE%40google.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/4bbbf6eb-8bc7-4a09-a2b7-0f554b43347cn%40chromium.org
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/4bbbf6eb-8bc7-4a09-a2b7-0f554b43347cn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw941EWV5gUz%3Dwe%3DA2xVoJRZU4NrdoFRRm9-Y4ih%3DH79cQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw941EWV5gUz%3Dwe%3DA2xVoJRZU4NrdoFRRm9-Y4ih%3DH79cQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGpy5DKdzFw_N7EzpebO%3DUGqJfJRr6nhP6%3DMPbLEw11apNyqQg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to