Thanks for doing all this paperwork; I know how frustrating it can be. LGTM 
3 contingent on a public explainer (but not blocking).

Best,

Alex

On Monday, June 1, 2026 at 1:09:31 AM UTC-7 Jason Leo wrote:

> Create a new feature ID request here: 
> https://github.com/web-platform-dx/web-features/issues/4086
>
> Don't know the process there, probably can not catch up M150
>
> On Thursday, May 28, 2026 at 2:47:40 AM UTC+8 Yoav Weiss wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, May 27, 2026 at 5:24:51 PM UTC+2 Rick Byers wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for proposing 
>> <https://github.com/web-platform-dx/web-features/issues/3864> a new 
>> feature ID to track support for this feature, but it looks like the report 
>> was missing some information and so got closed. Ensuring we have a good 
>> summary description and tracking of features is really important to enable 
>> web developers and AI coding agents to reason about the availability of the 
>> feature (eg. see webstatus.dev and the baseline project 
>> <https://web.dev/baseline>). Please add the requested information to the 
>> feature ID request and reopen it (or file a new one).
>>
>> Rick
>>
>> On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 11:18 AM Vladimir Levin <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> LGTM1
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 27, 2026 at 11:09:51 AM UTC-4 Alex Russell wrote:
>>
>> This seems extremely cool; is there perhaps an Explainer somewhere? This 
>> note on the Mozilla standards position request has most of that content and 
>> might help folks get more comfortable with the proposal as a stand-alone 
>> document;
>>
>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/
>> 1396#issuecomment-4363280736
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> On Tuesday, May 26, 2026 at 8:38:49 PM UTC-7 Chromestatus wrote:
>>
>> *Contact emails*
>> [email protected]
>>
>> *Specification*
>> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-color-5/#relative-alpha 
>>
>> *Summary*
>> Relative alpha colors refer to an origin color, and only change the alpha 
>> channel. The meaning of alpha channels is defined in CSS Color 4 § 4.2 
>> Representing Transparency in Colors: the <alpha-value> syntax. 
>>
>> *Blink component*
>> Blink>CSS 
>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3ECSS%22>
>>
>> *Web Feature ID*
>> Missing feature 
>>
>> *Motivation*
>> Relative alpha colors provide a direct CSS way to derive a translucent 
>> version of an existing color without rewriting its color channels. Authors 
>> currently need to duplicate component values or create separate precomputed 
>> tokens when they want “the same color, different opacity.” The CSS Color 5 
>> alpha() function preserves the original color components and only changes 
>> alpha, which reduces authoring overhead and makes color tokens easier to 
>> reuse and maintain. 
>>
>> *Initial public proposal*
>> *No information provided*
>>
>> *TAG review*
>> *No information provided* 
>>
>> *TAG review status*
>> Not applicable
>>
>> *Goals for experimentation*
>> None 
>>
>> *Risks*
>>
>>
>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>> *No information provided* 
>>
>> *Gecko*: No signal (https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/
>> issues/1396)
>>
>> *WebKit*: No signal (https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/
>> issues/657)
>>
>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>
>>
>> https://nerdy.dev/relative-alpha seems like a signal.
>>  
>>
>>
>> *Other signals*:
>>
>> *WebView application risks*
>>
>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that 
>> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? 
>> *No information provided* 
>>
>>
>> *Debuggability*
>> *No information provided* 
>>
>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, 
>> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>> Yes
>>
>> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
>> Yes 
>>
>>
>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>> *No information provided* 
>>
>> *Finch feature name*
>> CSSAlphaColorFunction 
>>
>> *Rollout plan*
>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>
>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>> False
>>
>> *Tracking bug*
>> https://issues.chromium.org/issues/492246715
>>
>> *Estimated milestones*
>> Shipping on desktop150 Shipping on Android150 Shipping on WebView150 
>>
>> *Anticipated spec changes*
>>
>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues 
>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of 
>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way). 
>> *No information provided*
>>
>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5070160203481088?gate=6508530389614592
>>
>> *Links to previous Intent discussions*
>> Intent to Prototype: https://groups.google.com/a/
>> chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/69b4e4d0.050a0220.b9121.
>> 0139.GAE%40google.com
>>
>>
>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>> <https://chromestatus.com>. 
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/
>> chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/4b6dd5d4-4411-4d41-af2b-
>> 008420db8d61n%40chromium.org 
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/4b6dd5d4-4411-4d41-af2b-008420db8d61n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/5eb8f100-82a2-46c2-9485-c9b15f52981bn%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to