> because such a cookie is serialized (to be sent in a Cookie header) as
"Foo=Bar",
How come? Where has the first equals sign gone?
Is that the same across browsers?


☆*PhistucK*


On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 6:41 PM Lily Chen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello blink-dev,
>
> This is a PSA that the following change to cookie parsing has shipped in
> Chromium in M148: crrev.com/c/7698176
>
> Summary:
>
> A cookie line of the form "=Foo=Bar; <attributes>" is now rejected in
> parsing, both in HTTP Set-Cookie headers and JavaScript APIs such as
> `document.cookie`.
>
> Details:
>
> Previously, a cookie line such as "=Foo=Bar" would be parsed as a cookie
> with an empty name and a value "Foo=Bar". This cookie value is ambiguous,
> because such a cookie is serialized (to be sent in a Cookie header) as
> "Foo=Bar", which appears identical to a cookie whose name is "Foo" (with
> value "Bar"). This is problematic when such an ambiguous cookie shadows a
> different cookie that the server considers more privileged.
>
> A special case of this serialization ambiguity was previously addressed in
> crbug.com/40060319 for cookie lines that might shadow "__Host-" and
> "__Secure-" prefixed cookie names, by rejecting such cookies at creation
> time. The present change applies the same approach to all such ambiguous
> cookies: a cookie line whose first semicolon-delimited substring
> (containing its name and value) begins with an equals sign and contains at
> least one other equals sign will now be rejected at parsing time.
>
> Web compatibility and interoperability:
>
> The current prevalence of "=Foo=Bar" cookies is extremely rare: a
> UseCounter
> <https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/5772> shows
> that about 0.00006% of page visits result in attempting to set such a
> cookie. (On the other hand, cookies simply having an empty name are a
> superset of these ambiguous "=Foo=Bar" cookies and are set on about 0.4%
> of page visits
> <https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/5771>. This
> change does not affect cookies with an empty name that do not contain an
> equals sign in their value.)
>
> We will follow up with proposed changes to specification text and Web
> Platform Tests.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lily
>
> o.b.o. Chromium //net/cookies maintainers
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAE24OxxH6suOcDUpomtPTsQPUn_wWHHKO_Q%2BFJdcKsyLZujffw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAE24OxxH6suOcDUpomtPTsQPUn_wWHHKO_Q%2BFJdcKsyLZujffw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CABc02_KR%2B6_9jNnNNTQOuHxz%3DEJ9QhBALHhQzbv-RGD4HxtU0w%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to