LGTM3

On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 11:40 AM Alex Russell <[email protected]>
wrote:

> LGTM2
>
> On Friday, June 19, 2026 at 11:01:45 AM UTC-7 Rick Byers wrote:
>
>> No problem, thank you Mustaq!
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2026 at 12:37 PM Mustaq Ahmed <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Rick!
>>>
>>> I requested a web feature ID at web-features/issues/4100
>>> <https://github.com/web-platform-dx/web-features/issues/4100> already.
>>> I thought I added the link somewhere on the Chromestatus page, sorry!
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2026 at 12:29 PM Rick Byers <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Chromestatus warned me there is no response to the web feature
>>>> question. Reading the guidance
>>>> <https://github.com/web-platform-dx/web-features/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#hints-for-distinguishing-features>,
>>>> I think probably you should request a new web feature ID for this, WDYT?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2026 at 12:25 PM Rick Byers <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Great, LGTM1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 4:59 PM Mustaq Ahmed <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 11:23 AM Rick Byers <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Happy to see this ship (after apparently dropping the ball on it
>>>>>>> myself
>>>>>>> <https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/587#issuecomment-3740724369>
>>>>>>> over a decade ago)!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Shouldn't there at least be a WPT for the existence of the
>>>>>>> `momentum` (i.e. in the IDL tests for WheelEvent)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, we have a test already for idl coverage, thanks for the catch! I
>>>>>> updated the chromestatus entry to mention this:
>>>>>> pointerevents/idlharness.https.window.html
>>>>>> <https://wpt.fyi/results/pointerevents/idlharness.https.window.html?label=experimental&label=master&aligned>
>>>>>>  (see
>>>>>> "attribute momentum").
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Ideally there'd also be a test that verifies the bool gets plumbed
>>>>>>> through, i,.e. by extending webdriver wheel actions. Might web 
>>>>>>> developers
>>>>>>> need that for proper automated testing of these advanced scrolling UX? 
>>>>>>> Can
>>>>>>> you at least file a bug to track the missing automation here? I'm OK not
>>>>>>> blocking shipping on that if you prefer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I filed this feature request for TestDriver:
>>>>>> web-platform-tests/wpt/issues/60724
>>>>>> <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/issues/60724>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rick
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 11:17 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is it possible to share an explainer (even an inline one) RE the
>>>>>>>> use cases for this and how we expect developers to use this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> A custom scroll curve that decays faster during the momentum phase
>>>>>> comes to mind. I believe we can review web developers' comments about
>>>>>> it to find more use cases (for context, this feature appears in the
>>>>>> top third of the spec-reactions
>>>>>> <https://foolip.github.io/spec-reactions/#:~:text=w3c/pointerevents%23587>
>>>>>>  dashboard). Unfortunately, I'll need some time before I can
>>>>>> complete a useful demo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, June 16, 2026 at 9:56:47 PM UTC+2 Mustaq Ahmed wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 3:32 PM Mike Taylor <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/16/26 11:21 a.m., Chromestatus wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Contact emails*
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Specification*
>>>>>>>>>> https://w3c.github.io/pointerevents/#dom-wheelevent-momentum
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Summary*
>>>>>>>>>> The wheel events on many native platforms simulate scrolling
>>>>>>>>>> inertia: the events continue to fire for a while after the user has 
>>>>>>>>>> lifted
>>>>>>>>>> the finger from the trackpad after a fling interaction. This feature
>>>>>>>>>> exposes a momentum attribute in wheel events which is true only for 
>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>> simulated events, differentiating them from the events fired during 
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> physical scroll interaction. This lets web developers ignore fling 
>>>>>>>>>> events
>>>>>>>>>> or customize rich fling effects.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Blink component*
>>>>>>>>>> Blink>Input
>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3EInput%22>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Web Feature ID*
>>>>>>>>>> Missing feature
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Motivation*
>>>>>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Initial public proposal*
>>>>>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *TAG review*
>>>>>>>>>> This feature is too small and non-controversial to justify a TAG
>>>>>>>>>> review.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *TAG review status*
>>>>>>>>>> Not applicable
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Goals for experimentation*
>>>>>>>>>> None
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Risks*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>>>>>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Gecko*: Positive (
>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2026JanMar/0148.html#:~:text=smaug%3A%20just%20having%20a%20flag%20should%20be%20easy.%20we%27ll%20just%20have%20to%20do%20%0Asomething%20on%20linux)
>>>>>>>>>>  Supported
>>>>>>>>>> the feature during PEWG meeting on 2026-03-11.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *WebKit*: No signal
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Can we file real vendor position issues for Gecko and WebKit
>>>>>>>>>> (but, nice to see the comments from Olli)?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Filed standard position requests:
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1425 and
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/688
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Web developers*: Positive (
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/587) See the dev
>>>>>>>>>> discussion and also many thumbs-up emojis.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *WebView application risks*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs,
>>>>>>>>>> such that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based
>>>>>>>>>> applications?
>>>>>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Debuggability*
>>>>>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms
>>>>>>>>>> (Windows, Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>>>>>>>>>> No
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>>>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
>>>>>>>>>> No
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>>>>>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Finch feature name*
>>>>>>>>>> WheelEventMomentum
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Rollout plan*
>>>>>>>>>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>>>>>>>>>> False
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Tracking bug*
>>>>>>>>>> https://crbug.com/40704952
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Estimated milestones*
>>>>>>>>>> Shipping on desktop 151
>>>>>>>>>> Shipping on Android 151
>>>>>>>>>> Shipping on WebView 151
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Anticipated spec changes*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web
>>>>>>>>>> compat or interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to 
>>>>>>>>>> known
>>>>>>>>>> github issues in the project for the feature specification) whose
>>>>>>>>>> resolution may introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to 
>>>>>>>>>> naming
>>>>>>>>>> or structure of the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>>>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/6631012282007552?gate=5864164607262720
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>>>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com>.
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion visit
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/6a3169e4.9a65a9ce.314fea.0299.GAE%40google.com
>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/6a3169e4.9a65a9ce.314fea.0299.GAE%40google.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>> To view this discussion visit
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/9807a897-2c36-4ce5-8e1e-244f92f33139n%40chromium.org
>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/9807a897-2c36-4ce5-8e1e-244f92f33139n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/235a04f5-03e8-471c-8c3f-cb72d4aa1e33n%40chromium.org
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/235a04f5-03e8-471c-8c3f-cb72d4aa1e33n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw-UK1HL_wPCU6DNfXKQSSJ0wO%3D3B41Nt8QS4dKvO8469Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to