I've filed a Mozilla standards 
position: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1428

> Can th is doc be made public?

That one discusses restricted bugs, so I can't make it public. I've instead 
created a brief design doc, which I've shared with 
blink-dev: 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HUT3myrlp5YsnzWUTZz7ETA5ZaJFM1fQtdFj_SyPHjQ/edit

We can indeed explore an alternative design in parallel. If this isn't a 
blocker, I'd like to request other LGTMs as 
well: https://chromestatus.com/feature/5915984063889408?gate=6183183769403392

On Wednesday, June 24, 2026 at 5:21:52 PM UTC+2 [email protected] wrote:

> I agree we should ship to match WebKit here. But also +1 to the question 
> of whether Mozilla has an opinion on the API shape and have any interest in 
> going beyond what WebKit has already done, such as in the direction Alex 
> suggests.
>
> Rick
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 11:16 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, June 17, 2026 at 2:16:09 PM UTC+3 Chromestatus wrote:
>>
>> *Contact emails*
>> [email protected]
>>
>> *Explainer*
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/orientation-event/#dom-deviceorientationevent-
>> requestpermission
>>
>> *Specification*
>> https://w3c.github.io/deviceorientation/ 
>>
>> *Design docs*
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zrhTooMd0Pqee8R0dJggDUeAgvt_
>> 3na_MaVefPpLG7o/edit?tab=t.0
>>
>>
>> Can this doc be made public?
>>  
>>
>>
>>
>> *Summary*
>> Allows web developers to call 
>> Device{Motion,Orientation}Event.requestPermission() 
>> to ask the user agent for device orientation and motion data to be shared 
>> with the page. Those two static methods return a promise that resolves to 
>> either "granted" or "denied" based on whether the user has allowed the user 
>> agent to share sensor data with pages. 
>>
>> *Blink component*
>> Blink>Sensor>DeviceOrientation 
>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3ESensor%3EDeviceOrientation%22>
>>
>> *Web Feature ID*
>> device-orientation-events 
>> <https://webstatus.dev/features/device-orientation-events> 
>>
>> *Motivation*
>> The new API was added to the Device Orientation spec in 
>> https://github.com/w3c/deviceorientation/pull/68 following security 
>> concerns raised in https://github.com/w3c/deviceorientation/issues/57. 
>>
>> *Initial public proposal*
>> https://github.com/w3c/deviceorientation/issues/57
>>
>> *Search tags*
>> device orientation <http:///features#tags:device%20orientation>, device 
>> motion <http:///features#tags:device%20motion>, permissions 
>> <http:///features#tags:permissions>
>>
>> *TAG review*
>> *No information provided* 
>>
>> *TAG review status*
>> Not applicable
>>
>> *Goals for experimentation*
>> None 
>>
>> *Risks*
>>
>>
>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>> The Chromium behavior is heavily tied to the permissions for the Sensors 
>> setting, which is being changed from Allow/Block to Allow/Ask/Block. This 
>> transition will be in two phases, where we first introduce the tri-state, 
>> but still default to Allow. Eventually will intend to move to an 
>> Ask-by-default state. In this latest stage, websites that register event 
>> listeners will not receive motion or orientation events until they call 
>> requestPermission(). This is the behavior as defined in the specification, 
>> and as is currently shipping in WebKit on iOS. 
>>
>> *Gecko*: In development (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
>> 1536382)
>>
>> *WebKit*: Shipped/Shipping (https://github.com/w3c/
>> deviceorientation/issues/57#issuecomment-498417027) Shipping on iOS.
>>
>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>
>> *Other signals*:
>>
>> *WebView application risks*
>>
>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that 
>> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? 
>> On WebView the sensor permission is granted by default, so adding the 2 
>> APIs will have no effect on applications, as `requestPermission()` will 
>> always return "granted". 
>>
>>
>> *Debuggability*
>> *No information provided* 
>>
>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, 
>> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>> Yes 
>> On the Android WebView, sensor access is always allowed, so this API will 
>> always return a promise that returns "granted". 
>>
>> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
>> Yes 
>> https://wpt.fyi/results/orientation-event/motion/requestPermission.https.
>> window.html https://wpt.fyi/results/orientation-event/orientation/
>> requestPermission.https.window.html?label=experimental&label=master&
>> aligned
>>
>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>> *No information provided* 
>>
>> *Finch feature name*
>> DeviceOrientationRequestPermission 
>>
>> *Rollout plan*
>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>
>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>> False
>>
>> *Tracking bug*
>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=947112
>>
>> *Adoption expectation*
>> Websites that have a valid reason for accessing sensor data (e.g. mobile 
>> games) will call the API to access the detailed sensor data.
>>
>> *Adoption plan*
>> Initially the feature will have no effect as long as the default 
>> permission is ALLOW. We plan on eventually moving this to ASK by default, 
>> requiring a call to requestPermission().
>>
>> *Non-OSS dependencies*
>>
>> Does the feature depend on any code or APIs outside the Chromium open 
>> source repository and its open-source dependencies to function? 
>> No
>>
>> *Estimated milestones*
>> Shipping on desktop151 DevTrial on desktop150 Shipping on Android151 
>> DevTrial 
>> on Android150 
>>
>> *Anticipated spec changes*
>>
>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues 
>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of 
>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way). 
>> *No information provided*
>>
>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5915984063889408?gate=6183183769403392
>>
>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>> <https://chromestatus.com>. 
>>
>> -- 
>>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "blink-dev" group.
>>
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/97b17ff4-35ab-4eee-9d70-70ba6feb278dn%40chromium.org
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/97b17ff4-35ab-4eee-9d70-70ba6feb278dn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/1ea53041-4075-4361-903c-a471055d0e8en%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to