Also, please request review (or n/a) from the adoption checkbox.

On Wednesday, July 8, 2026 at 2:14:50 PM UTC+2 Yoav Weiss wrote:

> LGTM1
>
> On Wednesday, July 1, 2026 at 6:24:53 PM UTC+2 [email protected] 
> wrote:
>
>> *Contact emails*
>> *[email protected]* <[email protected]>
>>  
>> *Specification*
>> *Fetch Standard: blob URL fetch algorithm* 
>> <https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#scheme-fetch:~:text=If%20rangeValue%20is%20failure%2C%20then%20return%20a%20network%20error.>
>>  
>> *Summary*
>> Blob URL requests made with Fetch or XMLHttpRequest now follow the Fetch 
>> Standard when parsing Range headers. Invalid or unsupported Range headers 
>> fail with a network error instead of returning the full blob response. This 
>> improves interoperability with other browsers and makes Chromium pass the 
>> corresponding Web Platform Tests.
>>  
>> *Blink component*
>> *Blink>Network>FetchAPI* 
>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3ENetwork%3EFetchAPI%22>
>>  
>> *Web Feature ID*
>> *fetch* <https://webstatus.dev/features/fetch>
>>  
>> *Motivation*
>> Chromium currently does not fully follow the Fetch Standard for blob URL 
>> requests with invalid `Range` headers. When range parsing fails, Chromium 
>> falls back to serving the full blob with `200 OK`, whereas the Fetch 
>> Standard requires the request to fail with a network error.
>>
>> This change aligns Chromium with the Fetch Standard and improves 
>> interoperability for Fetch and XMLHttpRequest range handling.
>> It resolves 52 failing Web Platform Tests in total, including 26 failing 
>> `fetch/range/` subtests [1] that are part of the Interop 2026 "Fetch, 
>> Uploads and Ranges" focus area [2], along with 26 corresponding 
>> XMLHttpRequest tests [3].
>>
>> [1] *web-platform-tests dashboard : fetch Blob* 
>> <https://wpt.fyi/results/fetch/range?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&view=subtest&q=label%3Ainterop-2026-fetch%20blob.any>
>>
>> [2]*web-platform-tests dashboard : Fetch upload and ranges Interop 2026* 
>> <https://wpt.fyi/results/fetch?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&view=interop&q=label%3Ainterop-2026-fetch>
>>
>> [3] *web-platform-tests dashboard : xhr blob* 
>> <https://wpt.fyi/results/xhr?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=%20blob-range.any>
>>  
>> *Initial public proposal*
>> *No information provided*
>>  
>> *TAG review*
>> N/A - no new API or platform design; this is a narrow conformance fix to 
>> existing Fetch Standard behavior.
>>  
>> *TAG review status*
>> Not applicable
>>  
>> *Goals for experimentation*
>> None
>>  
>> *Risks*
>>
>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>> Compatibility risk is expected to be low. This assessment is qualitative 
>> rather than based on dedicated telemetry for the exact affected scenario.
>> The change affects only Fetch and XMLHttpRequest requests to blob: URLs 
>> that include an invalid, malformed, or unsupported Range header. Requests 
>> without a Range header are unchanged, valid single-range requests continue 
>> to behave as before, and non-blob: URL requests are unaffected.
>> The previous Chromium behavior returned the full blob when Range parsing 
>> failed. This change instead follows the Fetch Standard by treating such 
>> requests as network errors. Firefox and Safari already implement this 
>> behavior, so the change improves interoperability and aligns Chromium with 
>> the web platform.
>> The primary compatibility risk is sites relying on Chromium's previous 
>> fallback behavior for invalid Range headers on blob: URLs. We expect this 
>> to be uncommon because it requires both issuing Range requests against 
>> blob: URLs and using invalid or unsupported Range syntax.
>>  
>>
>>
>> *Gecko: Shipped/Shipping, Firefox already implements this behavior and 
>> passes the corresponding Web Platform Tests WebKit: 
>> Shipped/Shipping, Safari already implements this behavior and passes the 
>> corresponding Web Platform Tests.*
>>
>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>
>> *Other signals*:
>>  
>> *Ergonomics*
>> No new API ergonomics risk. Existing Fetch/XHR usage is unchanged for 
>> valid single Range headers; invalid values now fail as specified.
>>  
>> *Activation*
>> No developer activation is required. The corrected behavior applies 
>> automatically to blob URL requests with Range headers.
>>  
>> *Security*
>> No new security risk. The change makes invalid blob URL Range headers 
>> fail instead of serving a full blob response, which is stricter than 
>> current behavior.
>>  
>> *WebView application risks*
>> *Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?*
>> Low. The risk is no higher for Android WebView applications than for 
>> websites. Only blob: URL requests with invalid, malformed, or unsupported 
>> Range headers are affected; all other requests are unchanged.
>>  
>>  
>> *Debuggability*
>> Existing Fetch/XHR error handling applies. Invalid blob URL Range 
>> requests surface as a network error / Fetch TypeError, and valid ranges 
>> continue to produce 206 Partial Content.
>>  
>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, 
>> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>> Yes
>> Applies to Chromium platforms that use the common blob URL loader for 
>> Fetch/XHR, including desktop, Android, and Android WebView.
>>  
>> *Is this feature fully tested by **web-platform-tests* 
>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>> *?*
>> Yes
>> Covered by Web Platform Tests under fetch/range/, including blob.any.html 
>> and blob.any.worker.html cases for invalid blob URL Range headers. The CL 
>> also updates expectations for the corresponding XHR blob range tests and 
>> adds Chromium unit coverage for Fetch-compatible single Range parsing and 
>> BlobURLLoader invalid range handling. Relevant CL: 
>> *https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7902659* 
>> <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7902659>
>>  
>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>> *No information provided*
>>  
>> *Finch feature name*
>> BlobURLFetchRangeHeaderValidation
>>  
>> *Rollout plan*
>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>  
>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>> False
>>  
>> *Tracking bug*
>> *https://issues.chromium.org/issues/510995915* 
>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues/510995915>
>>  
>> *Measurement*
>> No dedicated UseCounter is planned. This is a narrow standards 
>> conformance fix covered by WPT and Chromium unit tests; invalid blob URL 
>> Range header usage is expected to be rare.
>>  
>> *Availability expectation*
>> Available in Chromium-based browsers once the shipping milestone reaches 
>> stable.
>>  
>> *Adoption expectation*
>> No active developer adoption is expected because this is a standards 
>> conformance fix to existing Fetch/XHR behavior, not a new API. Sites using 
>> valid single Range headers continue to work. Sites using invalid blob URL 
>> Range syntax may need to fix that syntax if they currently rely on Chromium 
>> returning the full blob response.
>>  
>> *Adoption plan*
>> No developer adoption plan is needed. The change ships as a browser 
>> behavior fix and is validated by Web Platform Tests. Any affected sites 
>> should update invalid blob URL Range header usage to use valid single Range 
>> syntax.
>>  
>> *Non-OSS dependencies*
>> No
>>  
>> *Estimated milestones*
>> Shipping on desktop
>> 152
>> Shipping on Android
>> 152
>> Shipping on WebView
>> 152
>>  
>> *Anticipated spec changes*
>> None. This implements the current Fetch Standard behavior.
>>  
>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>> *https://chromestatus.com/feature/6237991531053056?gate=5496962989293568* 
>> <https://chromestatus.com/feature/6237991531053056?gate=5496962989293568>
>>  
>> This intent message was generated by *Chrome Platform Status* 
>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>  
>>  
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/d8da604f-feba-4a0c-8982-7b56f48cbec2n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to