As discussed at API OWNERS, it seems strange that we don't have any 
developer interest for this. Presumably folks are asking for this, right?

On Wednesday, October 14, 2026 at 2:02:55 AM UTC-7 Chromestatus wrote:

> *Contact emails*
> [email protected]
>
> *Explainer*
> *No information provided*
>
> *Specification*
>
> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-pseudo-4/#selectordef-highlight-highlight-name-selector
>  
>
> *Summary*
> Introduces a universal selector for custom highlights, ::highlight(*), 
> which matches the highlight pseudo-elements of all custom highlights 
> regardless of their name. The * argument contributes zero specificity, so 
> its declarations act as a base style that rules naming a specific highlight 
> override through the cascade. 
>
> *Blink component*
> Blink>CSS 
> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3ECSS%22>
>
> *Web Feature ID*
> Missing feature 
>
> *Motivation*
> Styling shared properties across custom highlights requires repeating the 
> same declarations for every registered name. The CSSWG resolved to allow 
> ::highlight(*). 
>
> *Initial public proposal*
> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9091
>
> *Search tags*
> Custom Highlight <http:///features#tags:Custom%20Highlight>
>
> *TAG review*
> *No information provided* 
>
> *TAG review status*
> Pending
>
> *Goals for experimentation*
> None 
>
> *Risks*
>
>
> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
> *No information provided* 
>
> *Gecko*: Under consideration (
> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1460)
>
> *WebKit*: No signal (
> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/728)
>
> *Web developers*: No signals
>
> *Other signals*:
>
> *WebView application risks*
>
> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that 
> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? 
> *No information provided* 
>
>
> *Debuggability*
> *No information provided* 
>
> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, 
> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
> Yes
>
> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
> Yes 
>
>
> *Flag name on about://flags*
> *No information provided* 
>
> *Finch feature name*
> *No information provided* 
>
> *Non-finch justification*
> *No information provided*
>
> *Rollout plan*
> Will ship enabled for all users
>
> *Requires code in //chrome?*
> False
>
> *Tracking bug*
> https://issues.chromium.org/issues/408003366
>
> *Estimated milestones*
> Shipping on desktop 158 
> Shipping on Android 158 
> Shipping on WebView 158 
>
> *Anticipated spec changes*
>
> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues 
> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of 
> the API in a non-backward-compatible way). 
> *No information provided*
>
> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5174965228929024?gate=6101897755885568
>
> *Links to previous Intent discussions*
> Intent to Prototype: 
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/6a7e62a2.2164c308.b1fa7.0128.GAE%40google.com
>
>
> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
> <https://chromestatus.com>. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/6498baee-758d-4bb6-82df-eff26e9e7787n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to