LGTM2

On Tue, Oct 27, 2026 at 7:05 PM Alex Russell <[email protected]>
wrote:

> LGTM1; we've had intermittent feedback over the years about how
> WebTransport wasn't well suited to latency-sensitive work, and it's great
> to see these additions.
>
> On Thursday, October 22, 2026 at 3:11:29 PM UTC-7 Monica Chintala wrote:
>
>> FYI, this feature depends on WebTransport send groups and stream
>> prioritization - Chrome Platform Status
>> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fchromestatus.com%2Ffeature%2F5235261159112704&data=05%7C02%7Cmonicach%40microsoft.com%7C9e0b9f4149a541fafafe08df307d863d%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C639282987879917270%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fMplyzw4jssGTpxdGq0wgG5zQ2s6HhhTQI6b1Zm6cps%3D&reserved=0>,
>> which is currently in progress for I2S. I'm working on getting the
>> necessary approvals now so we're ready to proceed, while ensuring this
>> feature ships only after the dependent feature has shipped.
>>
>> On Thursday, October 22, 2026 at 2:24:42 PM UTC-7 Chromestatus wrote:
>>
>>> *Contact emails*
>>> [email protected], [email protected]
>>
>>
>>>
>>> *Explainer*
>>>
>>> https://github.com/w3c/webtransport/blob/main/explainer.md#5-sending-and-receiving-datagrams
>>>
>>> *Specification*
>>> https://www.w3.org/TR/webtransport/#datagram-writable
>>>
>>> *Summary*
>>> Adds the modern WebTransport Datagram sending API.
>>> WebTransportDatagramDuplexStream.createWritable() creates independent
>>> WebTransportDatagramsWritable streams. Each writable has mutable sendGroup
>>> and sendOrder attributes for expressing relative priority among queued
>>> WebTransport data in the same send group. Chromium currently applies this
>>> ordering among Datagram writables. The implementation also reports the
>>> negotiated maximum outgoing Datagram payload size and discards oversized
>>> writes as required by the WebTransport specification.
>>>
>>> *Blink component*
>>> Blink>Network>WebTransport
>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3ENetwork%3EWebTransport%22>
>>>
>>> *Web Feature ID*
>>> webtransport <https://webstatus.dev/features/webtransport>
>>>
>>> *Motivation*
>>> The original WebTransport Datagram API exposes only a single writable
>>> stream, preventing applications from independently scheduling different
>>> classes of latency-sensitive messages. The newer API allows applications
>>> such as games, remote-interaction systems, and real-time media applications
>>> to create multiple Datagram writables and prioritize urgent data over less
>>> time-sensitive data while preserving FIFO ordering within each writable.
>>> Implementing this API also resolves WebTransport Datagram interoperability
>>> failures included in Interop 2026.
>>>
>>> *Initial public proposal*
>>> https://github.com/w3c/webtransport/issues/451
>>>
>>> *TAG review*
>>> This is an incremental API addition within the existing WebTransport
>>> specification and does not introduce a new architectural primitive. A
>>> separate feature-level TAG review is not planned.
>>>
>>> *TAG review status*
>>> Not applicable
>>>
>>> *Goals for experimentation*
>>> None
>>>
>>> *Risks*
>>>
>>>
>>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>>> Interoperability risk Medium. The API is defined in the WebTransport
>>> Candidate Recommendation and covered by WPT. Implementations may
>>> nevertheless differ in scheduling boundaries, particularly priority
>>> interaction between streams and Datagrams. Chromium currently implements
>>> ordering among Datagram writables; unified stream-and-Datagram arbitration
>>> may require additional implementation work and specification clarification.
>>> Compatibility risk Low. The API adds createWritable() and
>>> WebTransportDatagramsWritable without removing datagrams.writable. Existing
>>> applications continue to work. The negotiated maxDatagramSize and
>>> oversized-write behavior are intentional conformance improvements but could
>>> expose applications that assumed a fixed outgoing Datagram limit.
>>>
>>> *Gecko*: Shipped/Shipping (
>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2007174) Firefox
>>> implemented and related wpt tests are passing
>>>
>>> *WebKit*: Shipped/Shipping (https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/pull/53733) 
>>> WebKit
>>> implemented and related wpt tests are passing
>>>
>>> *Web developers*: Positive (
>>> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/interop/issues/1121) The Interop
>>> 2026 WebTransport proposal received 28 👍 reactions and explicitly
>>> requested coverage of prioritization features and Datagram
>>> interoperability. Developers also reported active WebTransport use and
>>> significant cross-browser differences in Datagram behavior.
>>>
>>> *Other signals*: Consensus to add this feature was achieved at the W3C
>>> TPAC conference in November 2025:
>>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebTransport/Meetings2023#2025_W3C_TPAC_Meeting_-_Kobe,_Japan
>>>
>>> *Ergonomics*
>>> Low to medium. Multiple writable streams and mutable sendGroup and
>>> sendOrder attributes provide useful scheduling control but introduce
>>> concepts developers must understand. Higher sendOrder values take
>>> precedence within a send group, so badly chosen priorities can starve
>>> lower-priority data or produce unexpected ordering. FIFO behavior within
>>> each writable and standardized defaults preserve straightforward behavior
>>> for applications that do not need advanced prioritization.
>>>
>>> *Activation*
>>> Low. This is an additive API behind the WebTransportDatagramsWritable
>>> runtime feature. It does not remove or replace the existing
>>> datagrams.writable API. Enabling the feature also makes maxDatagramSize
>>> reflect the negotiated outgoing payload limit and discards writes that
>>> exceed that limit, as required by the specification. The main activation
>>> risk is inconsistent priority scheduling across browsers, particularly
>>> around the boundary between streams and Datagrams. Rollout should follow
>>> WPT and interoperability validation.
>>>
>>> *Security*
>>> Low. The API does not grant new network access, expose additional data,
>>> or weaken WebTransport's secure-context requirements. The primary
>>> implementation concern is renderer-driven resource exhaustion through
>>> excessive writable registrations or queued Datagram payloads. Chromium
>>> mitigates this through network-service validation and limits on writable
>>> registrations, queued Datagram counts, retained bytes, expiration, and
>>> scheduling batch sizes. Invalid renderer-provided identifiers and priority
>>> updates are rejected.
>>>
>>> *WebView application risks*
>>>
>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>> Low. This is an additive WebTransport API implemented in cross-platform
>>> Blink and network-service code. It does not remove or change the
>>> availability of the existing datagrams.writable API and requires no
>>> WebView-specific integration. Behavior follows the existing availability of
>>> WebTransport in WebView.
>>>
>>>
>>> *Debuggability*
>>> Chrome DevTools does not currently provide feature-specific inspection
>>> for Datagram writable queues or priorities. Existing WebTransport
>>> diagnostics, NetLog, network-service logging, and QUIC logging can be used
>>> to diagnose connection and scheduling behavior
>>>
>>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>>> Yes
>>>
>>> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
>>> Yes
>>>
>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/webtransport/idlharness.https.sub.any.html?label=experimental&label=master&aligned
>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/webtransport/datagrams.https.any.html?label=experimental&label=master&aligned
>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/webtransport/datagrams-writable.https.any.html?label=experimental&label=master&aligned
>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/webtransport/sendgroup.https.any.html?label=experimental&label=master&aligned
>>>
>>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>>> enable-experimental-web-platform-features
>>>
>>> *Finch feature name*
>>> WebTransportDatagramsWritable
>>>
>>> *Rollout plan*
>>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>>
>>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>>> False
>>>
>>> *Tracking bug*
>>> https://issues.chromium.org/issues/547572475
>>>
>>> *Availability expectation*
>>> The feature is expected to be available across major browsers as part of
>>> the W3C WebTransport specification. Firefox implements the Datagram
>>> writable and prioritization APIs, and WebKit has landed an implementation
>>> that is currently in development.
>>>
>>> *Adoption expectation*
>>> Adoption is expected primarily among latency-sensitive WebTransport
>>> applications, including games, remote-interaction systems, and real-time
>>> media. Applications that need multiple independently prioritized Datagram
>>> queues are expected to begin adopting the API within 12 months of broad
>>> browser availability.
>>>
>>> *Adoption plan*
>>> Adoption is expected to happen organically through WebTransport
>>> documentation, examples, and Interop 2026 visibility. Existing applications
>>> do not need to migrate because the existing datagrams.writable API remains
>>> available.
>>>
>>> *Estimated milestones*
>>> Shipping on desktop 159
>>> DevTrial on desktop 155
>>> Shipping on Android 159
>>> DevTrial on Android 155
>>> Shipping on WebView 159
>>>
>>> *Anticipated spec changes*
>>>
>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of
>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>> No API-shape changes are currently anticipated. The WebTransport Working
>>> Group may further clarify scheduling boundaries and priority arbitration
>>> between streams and Datagrams in the same send group. Such clarification is
>>> expected to affect scheduling behavior only, not the exposed API.
>>>
>>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5183354944225280?gate=6105683064913920
>>>
>>> *Links to previous Intent discussions*
>>> Intent to Prototype:
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/6a920d86.e8a51b51.6abb3.0299.GAE%40google.com
>>>
>>>
>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>> <https://chromestatus.com>.
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/1b8eda2b-f976-4b29-9614-60378180f13cn%40chromium.org
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/1b8eda2b-f976-4b29-9614-60378180f13cn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw-wss4zhBBJcM0s1-EYhgDHs0a3zm8yPjB_gtLDTf6Pmw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to