LGTM2

On Mon, Nov 2, 2026 at 3:28 AM Philip Jägenstedt <[email protected]>
wrote:

> LGTM1
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2026 at 2:54 PM 'Viktoriya Bryhider' via blink-dev <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> This feature implementation provides the scheduling functionality for
>> sendGroup and sendOrder, which will also help enable
>>  WebTransportDatagramsWritable - WebTransport Datagram writable streams
>> and prioritization - Chrome Platform Status
>> <https://chromestatus.com/feature/5183354944225280>
>>
>> On Wednesday, October 28, 2026 at 4:34:36 PM UTC-7 Chromestatus wrote:
>>
>>> *Contact emails*
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> *Explainer*
>>>
>>> https://github.com/w3c/webtransport/blob/main/explainer.md#6-sending-video-one-stream-per-frame-or-segment-with-send-order
>>>
>>> https://github.com/w3c/webtransport/blob/main/explainer.md#7-sending-real-time-game-data-per-stream-with-send-order
>>>
>>> https://github.com/w3c/webtransport/blob/main/explainer.md#8-managing-bandwidth-with-send-groups
>>>
>>> *Specification*
>>> https://www.w3.org/TR/webtransport/#webtransportsendstream
>>>
>>> *Summary*
>>> WebTransport already lets sites send data through WritableStreams. This
>>> feature lets applications assign outgoing streams to send groups and use
>>> sendOrder to prioritize streams within each group. It also provides sending
>>> statistics for streams and groups while preserving WritableStream transfer
>>> behavior.
>>>
>>> *Blink component*
>>> Blink>Network>WebTransport
>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3ENetwork%3EWebTransport%22>
>>>
>>> *Web Feature ID*
>>> webtransport <https://webstatus.dev/features/webtransport>
>>>
>>> *Motivation*
>>> Real-time applications often send multiple independent flows over one
>>> WebTransport session. When those flows compete for bandwidth, applications
>>> need to keep one flow from dominating while deciding which streams within
>>> each flow should go first. They also need visibility into sending progress
>>> so they can understand how those flows are performing.
>>>
>>> *Initial public proposal*
>>> *No information provided*
>>>
>>> *TAG review*
>>> *No information provided*
>>>
>>> *TAG review status*
>>> Not applicable
>>>
>>> *Goals for experimentation*
>>> None
>>>
>>> *Risks*
>>>
>>>
>>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>>> Firefox and Safari already expose WebTransportSendStream and the
>>> WebTransportSendGroup API; send groups shipped in Firefox 155 and Safari
>>> 26.4. Changing Chrome’s outgoing streams from plain WritableStream objects
>>> to WebTransportSendStream objects therefore aligns their JavaScript type
>>> with those browsers. Existing writing behavior and instanceof
>>> WritableStream checks remain compatible. Enabling this feature changes
>>> outgoing unidirectional streams and the writable side of bidirectional
>>> streams from plain WritableStream objects to WebTransportSendStream
>>> objects, so exact constructor or prototype check may need updating.
>>>
>>> *Gecko*: Shipped/Shipping (
>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2007165) Firefox exposes
>>>  WebTransportSendStream as a  WritableStream  subclass for outgoing
>>> WebTransport streams, including streams created by
>>> createUnidirectionalStream(). It added WebTransportSendGroup and
>>> createSendGroup() in Firefox 155, released September 1, 2026; group
>>> assignments are passed to its network implementation -
>>> https://www.firefox.com/en-US/firefox/155.0/releasenotes/ Firefox does
>>> not yet provide equivalent statistics behavior. In its current source,
>>> WebTransportSendStream.getStats() rejects with NotSupportedError.
>>>
>>> *WebKit*: Shipped/Shipping (
>>> https://github.com/mdn/browser-compat-data/blob/main/api/WebTransportSendGroup.json#L52)
>>>  WebKit
>>> implements WebTransportSendGroup, WebTransportSendStream,
>>> sendGroup/sendOrder, both statistics methods, transferability, and the
>>> specialized writer. Safari 26.4 includes these WebTransport additions.
>>>
>>> *Web developers*: Positive (
>>> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/interop/issues/1121) The Interop
>>> 2026 WebTransport proposal received 28 positive reactions. Developers also
>>> reported active WebTransport use and significant cross-engine differences.
>>>
>>> *Other signals*:
>>>
>>> *Ergonomics*
>>> Send groups divide outgoing streams into separate bandwidth-sharing
>>> groups; sendOrder prioritizes streams within a group, groups are scheduled
>>> separately. Developers could mistake a higher sendOrder for a guarantee of
>>> delivery order or throughput. Priority is sender-side scheduling, and flow
>>> control and network conditions still affect delivery. Stream and group
>>> getStats() return asynchronous snapshots; bytesWritten, bytesSent, and
>>> bytesAcknowledged represent different stages of transmission, not
>>> interchangeable totals. Outgoing streams remain WritableStream subclasses,
>>> so existing writing APIs continue to work. The specialized
>>> WebTransportWriter is not part of this launch: getWriter() still returns a
>>> WritableStreamDefaultWriter.
>>>
>>> *Activation*
>>> Enabling the feature changes the runtime type and prototype of outgoing
>>> unidirectional streams and the writable side of bidirectional streams from
>>> plain WritableStream to WebTransportSendStream for all sites using those
>>> streams; sites do not need to call createSendGroup() to observe that
>>> change. Code that checks the exact constructor or prototype may behave
>>> differently if code assumes exact stream type: stream.constructor ===
>>> WritableStream  or Object.getPrototypeOf(stream) ===
>>> WritableStream.prototype. Existing stream writes should continue to work,
>>> and no server change is needed to use the new client-side priority
>>> controls. Transfer of existing send streams must continue working before
>>> activation.
>>>
>>> *Security*
>>> No new network capability or origin boundary is introduced. The API
>>> operates only on streams belonging to an existing secure-context
>>> WebTransport session. A send group from another WebTransport object is
>>> rejected. Statistics expose byte counters for the application's own streams
>>> and groups.
>>>
>>> *WebView application risks*
>>>
>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>> Low. This is an additive API on existing WebTransport streams and does
>>> not change connection establishment or network behavior.
>>>
>>>
>>> *Debuggability*
>>> The stream's sendGroup and sendOrder values are directly observable from
>>> script. Both stream and group getStats() expose bytesWritten, bytesSent,
>>> and bytesAcknowledged; group statistics aggregate streams in that group.
>>> DevTools does not currently provide dedicated WebTransport stream
>>> inspection, so developers primarily diagnose this API through script and
>>> application logging.
>>>
>>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>>> Yes
>>>
>>> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
>>> Yes
>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/webtransport/sendgroup.https.any.html
>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/webtransport/sendorder.https.any.html
>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/webtransport/sendstream-bad-chunk.https.any.html
>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/webtransport/send-stream-stats.https.any.html
>>>
>>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>>> enable-experimental-web-platform-features
>>>
>>> *Finch feature name*
>>> WebTransportSendGroup
>>>
>>> *Rollout plan*
>>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>>
>>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>>> False
>>>
>>> *Tracking bug*
>>> https://crbug.com/568825278
>>>
>>> *Availability expectation*
>>> Firefox 155 ships createSendGroup(), and Safari 26.4 ships WebTransport
>>> with the corresponding WebKit group and send-stream interfaces. Chrome
>>> shipping would make the API shape available across the major engines.
>>>
>>> *Adoption expectation*
>>> Adoption is expected mainly among existing WebTransport applications
>>> with multiple concurrent streams and latency-sensitive traffic.
>>>
>>> *Adoption plan*
>>> Adoption is expected to occur organically through WebTransport
>>> documentation, examples, and client library support. Developers can
>>> progressively enhance existing code by feature-detecting getStats().
>>>
>>> *Non-OSS dependencies*
>>>
>>> Does the feature depend on any code or APIs outside the Chromium open
>>> source repository and its open-source dependencies to function?
>>> No
>>>
>>> *Estimated milestones*
>>> Shipping on desktop 159
>>> DevTrial on desktop 153
>>> Shipping on Android 159
>>> DevTrial on Android 153
>>> Shipping on WebView 159
>>>
>>> *Anticipated spec changes*
>>>
>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of
>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>> None known for the WebTransportSendStream or WebTransportSendGroup.
>>>
>>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5235261159112704?gate=6451678743232512
>>>
>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>> <https://chromestatus.com>.
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/45edd3e5-5fd8-4255-b3a4-47131e792a03n%40chromium.org
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/45edd3e5-5fd8-4255-b3a4-47131e792a03n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAARdPYf%2B6tauqu0Rbj8JxrKL1RLTpU1YzYS2dcf7vzV%3Db_NzmQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAARdPYf%2B6tauqu0Rbj8JxrKL1RLTpU1YzYS2dcf7vzV%3Db_NzmQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw98-AZbAcvRJv9mh2%2BTnXtzzYMSWfQRjt_k6nMVeL%2BUmg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to