The license of Blink Qt is GPLv3 without restrictions. We updated the corresponding files
Adrian > On 19 Jun 2017, at 14:26, Daniel Gnoutcheff <gnout...@softwarefreedom.org> > wrote: > > I'm evaluating blink-qt for use at my workplace. One of my requirements > is that it should be free software as defined by the Debian Free > Software Guidelines (DFSG). > > Unfortunately, the license statements I've found in the source code are > a bit contradictory: > > - `debian/copyright` says it's GPLv3 or later with additional > restrictions, inc. a prohibition against rebranding. > > - But the top-level `LICENCE` file says I may use blink-qt under > GPLv3 with no additional restrictions. > > Can I assume that the top-level LICENCE file takes precedence over > debian/copyright? If so, would you accept a patch that brings > `debian/copyright` in line with `LICENCE`? > > Thanks much! > > Have a good one, > Daniel Gnoutcheff > Systems Administrator > Software Freedom Law Center > > _______________________________________________ > Blink mailing list > Blink@lists.ag-projects.com > http://lists.ag-projects.com/mailman/listinfo/blink
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Blink mailing list Blink@lists.ag-projects.com http://lists.ag-projects.com/mailman/listinfo/blink