If talkingarch.tk had finger response capability that's another possible location for a valid sha512sum. What I recommend going forward is for users testing with sha512sum they locate each place you have them and compare all of them. Anything different please ask them to write supp...@talkingarch.tk and let them know because something has been defaced and you just got an alert to that deface. File permissions on web pages can provide some protection, but a backup held off the internet so quick restores can be done buys anyone a little version control management capability.
On Wed, 23 May 2018, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 09:16:36 > From: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> > To: blinux-list@redhat.com > Subject: Re: talkingarch support off for now > > Thankfully I haven't had a problem with the website being defaced. But yes, I > can put the sha512sum up there along with signature verification. I think that > it's a good idea in the future to have a signature verification as well as a > sha512sum. A workable fallback is always a good thing. > > Imetumwa kutoka nyumba yangu > > _______________________________________________ > Blinux-list mailing list > Blinux-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > > -- _______________________________________________ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
