All;
We have kicked off the meeting for each of
the design team last week. Below is the minute
from the meeting we had for the ACH design team.
Date/Time:
----------------------------------
2007.01.30 8:00PST-9:00PST
Attendees
----------------------------------
John Elwell
John Zhao
Olaf Bergmann
Theo Zourzouvillys
Shida Schubert
Planned Agenda
----------------------------------
1. Sorting out the remaining text needed in the analysis document.
2. Tackling issues understood as mandatory to tackle.
3. Schedule the next meeting.
Discussions
--------------------------------
A). There was a debate about possibly doing another survey on finding out
how UAC implementations react to different status code, this would
lead to
making a recommendation on status code, outside of the ACH
context.
> Conclusion: It's too early to do another survey.
B). Rather than sorting out the remaining text needed in the analysis
document,
much time was put into re-capturing the WG's consensus at the IETF 70.
The design team looked at the minutes and other notes from the
meeting
and agreed that issue 1, 2, 3 and 4 had clear consensus that work
needs to
be done. Some commented that issue 4(clarifying the use of 6xx in
ACH) is
one of the most important aspect of this work.
For issue 5, there were 3 interpretation of the minute/note
1. Define a standardize way for UA to configure proxy executing
the ACH
2. Define a way for UA to find out which configuration means proxy
supports.
3. Both of above.
There were some strong favor to consider 1 or 3.
C). Scheduling the next meeting
> Will try to meet up on the call every week until the IETF 71.
D). Next step
> John will reflect the comments from the IETF 70.
> Design team will discuss potential recommendations that draft
will make
on the mailing list dedicated to the design team.
Regards
Shida
_______________________________________________
BLISS mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss
