> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> On Behalf Of Huelsemann, Martin
> Sent: 18 April 2008 11:16
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [BLISS] Technical problem -- correlating dialogs
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Im Auftrag von Paul Kyzivat
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 11. April 2008 17:39
> > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Betreff: Re: [BLISS] Technical problem -- correlating dialogs
> > 
> > And I suppose this could be combined with some other sort of 
> > authorization. There could be one mechanism with a cookie for 
> > those who 
> > can support it, and this weaker mechanism could require 
> some special 
> > credential or a whitelist, that was by policy restricted to 
> gateways.
> > 
> >     Paul
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I also think for the internet draft it could be sufficient to 
> concentrate to describe the cookie mechanism for a pure 
> internet environment and strongly recommend to use this, but 
> mention the option for a weaker (but possibly also cookie) 
> mechanism. Possibly also in combination with a whitelist for 
> the subscription. But any way this could be described in 
> specs for networks that can guarantee to prevent 
> invastigation of privacy, which I think will be possible for 
> example in the 3GPP IMS.
> 
> 
> 
> The other question is, how is the cookie conveyed from 
> monitor to agent? Did we come to a conclusion for this? Is it 
> possible to use the Call-Info header for this purpose? In the 
> design team there was a discussion to use the Call-Info 
> header in the following way:
> 
> 
> 
>     For example, consider this header inserted in a response 
> by a monitor:
> 
>     Call-Info: 
> <sip:atlanta.example.com?Call-Info=%3cx:y%3e;purpose%3dcall-co
> mpletion%3bcookie%3d123456>
>           ;purpose=call-completion
>           ;m=NR
> 
>     The contained monitor's contact URI is thus:
> 
>     
> sip:atlanta.example.com?Call-Info=%3cx:y%3e;purpose%3dcall-com
> pletion%3bcookie%3d123456
> 
>     When that URI is used to generate a SUBSCRIBE, the 
> resulting request
>     looks like this:
> 
>    SUBSCRIBE sip:atlanta.example.com SIP/2.0
>    Call-Info: <x:y>;purpose=call-completion;cookie=123456
>    Call-Info: <...>;purpose=call-completion;m=NR
[JRE] I don't understand how you get two Call-Info header fields.

John
_______________________________________________
BLISS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss

Reply via email to