Spencer, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> On Behalf Of Spencer Dawkins
> Sent: 05 May 2008 00:25
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [BLISS] Rejection conditions for ACH
> 
> Hi, John,
> 
> The suggested text worked for me until I got down to "Global 
> Rejection".
> 
> >>           <t>Global rejection. The user has responded to this
> >> call by rejecting it with the preference that all other
> >> branches should be cancelled and forwarding to voicemail,
> >> forwarding to an assistant, etc.
> >> should not take place.
> 
> I am almost sure I agree, but I was getting lost between 
> present and past 
> tense language (correct as written, just not easy to parse in 
> the same 
> sentence). If you're saying
> 
> "The user has responded to the call by globally rejecting it with the 
> preference that all other branches should be cancelled. 
> Forwarding to voice 
> mail, to an assistant, etc. should not take place."
> 
> I agree, and I'd appreciate it if you considered the 
> suggested text. At a 
> minimum, s/and forwarding/and that forwarding/ to be parallel with 
> "cancelled" would help.
[JRE] I prefer this change, which makes it clear that the PREFERENCE is
that forwarding to voicemail etc. should not take place. Thanks.

John
_______________________________________________
BLISS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss

Reply via email to