I would like to get list confirmation of what was agreed in the BLISS session in Minneapolis concerning this draft. My notes (I don't see any minutes yet!) indicate the following:
- target the document at BCP rather than informational; - add normative statements where appropriate (in particular for use of response codes); - stick to 480 as the response code for explicit rejection / local; - make reference to a to-be-written framework draft on REST (Jonathan Rosenberg / Keith Griffin) - define URL structures for ACH configuration (forwarding, DND, etc.) and give examples; - reference a generic event package for notifications of resource changes (draft-roach-sip-http-subscribe seems to be a candidate). Please let me know if you disagree by 2008-12-19. John _______________________________________________ BLISS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss
