Scott, Apologies for the delay.
2009/5/5 Scott Orton <[email protected]>: > Michael, > Can this also be addressed by subscribing to the dialog event? We > might want to specify in a subscription to the dialog event that we want > to be informed of any call parked by the subscribing user. This is a > change from the current draft and would require a new uri parm in the > Subscription. This way we can send the refer to the party being parked > instead of using the unsolicited refer. > > Scott As Dale has just pointed out, it won't work without extensions to the dialog event package and/or changes to the parked UA. Since all this is to work around a parked UA that doesn't provide a usable contact, it seems that putting more requirements on it is unlikely to make the problem better! On balance, I think we are better off staying with the approach in the draft. I will be updating the draft shortly, in light of the comments raised (I am waiting for one last set of comments offlist). Regards, Michael _______________________________________________ BLISS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss
