Hi,

a few comments on the following draft:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bliss-call-park-extension-01.txt

Abstract:  "An additional URI parameter is also described".
Replace described with specified or defined.

Actually, Informational RFCs cannot define SIP URI parameters. As
stated in Section 7.1 of draft-peterson-rai-rfc3427bis, a standards
track RFC is needed.

Section 2: s/section 2.15/Section 2.15/ and perform a similar change
throughout the document.

I guess Section 6 has been included in the document as a historical
reference. Can we move that information to an appendix?


Cheers,

Gonzalo
_______________________________________________
BLISS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss

Reply via email to