> > ** Technical > > > > > > * 2004 Failure codes for CC SUBSCRIBE > > > > [New for -05.] The text is inconsistent regarding the > > failure code for a CC SUBSCRIBE for a call that the monitor > > has no record of: 7.2 says 404, 9.7 says 481. It seems to > > me that 404 should be reserved for SUBSCRIBEs for which the > > monitor cannot identify the managed AOR, and 481 used for > > SUBSCRIBEs that designate a proper AOR but not a known call > > for that AOR. > > I agree with your analysis. My proposal is to solve this inconsistency > with a clear definition in subclause 9.7, and delete the regarding > definitions from subclause 7.2, in order to avoid redundant > specification.
Given that we are giving up on "call correlation", the monitor no longer produces 481 responses to new SUBSCRIBEs. Removing that case from the two sections eliminates the inconsistency. However, I think removing the redundancy is a good idea; the titles of the two sections make it clear that they are related, so a reader will have no difficulty finding the specification of response codes. Dale _______________________________________________ BLISS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss
