Are you talink here about the names of constructs in the ABNF, or the values actually sent on the wire.
If the latter, I would rather not change those solely for editorial beauty. If a technical reason yes, but lets keep the parts of implementations that do work from having to make unnecessary changes. Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Worley, Dale R (Dale) > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 1:58 AM > To: Shida Schubert; BLISS > Subject: Re: [BLISS] WGLC for > draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-07 -- 2006 Remove the "cc-" > prefix in lines of the CC event package? > > The value names in the CC event package all start with "cc-". > It seems to me that this is redundant, and that the names > would be better as "state", "service-retention" (now > obsolete), and "URI". > > In any case, sections 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3 are named after > the data items, but their titles are not consistent in regard > to prefixes on the names of the data items. > > Dale > _______________________________________________ > BLISS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss > _______________________________________________ BLISS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss
