Keith; Below is the 09 version of the draft that was used to create the diff.
http://bliss-ietf.org/drafts/draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-09.txt Regards Shida On Mar 31, 2011, at 6:32 PM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote: > Can you provide access to the -09 version somewhere (and please not as the > real -09 version as the changes are proposed for WG approval, and should not > yet form part of the official WG draft). > > I find the diff link provided less than useful in this form, and there are > other things that need to be checked. > > Keith > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > [email protected] > Sent: 31 March 2011 16:05 > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [BLISS] more comments on the CC draft > > Dear colleagues, > > during the last WGLC I again received a lot of comments from Dave for > editorials and spelling corrections, thanks again for checking, my apologies > for not having detected them myself. > > Besides the editorials, Dave commented that the procedures are based very > much on the assumption of a underlying network architecture where there is a > clear seperation between the UA on the user device and the CC agent/monitor > which is located in the network. Dave proposed to better consider the case > where the CC agent/monitor is colocated with the UA on the user device. > An example is a simple UA uses CC via a AS in the network, and when this UA > is not available for CC recall, we said that the CC agent SHALL suspend the > CC request. But the suspension policy of a more sophisticated agent of a CC > App on a device could be different, therefore it was changed to 'SHOULD be > suspended'. There are some other changes in this direction. There are no > syntax changes. > > Even though they were contributed post WGLC, in my opinion those changes are > very useful for a more comprehensive CC solution, and therefore should be > considered. I have provisionally provided a 09 version of the internet draft. > You can find the changes at http://bliss-ietf.org/drafts/diff_ccbs.html > > Your opinions? > > > Regards, Martin > > > _______________________________________________ > BLISS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss
_______________________________________________ BLISS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss
