> From: Shida Schubert <[email protected]> > > The draft is going through IETF last call not WGLC > so any comments you have should be sent to > [email protected]. > > Detail review is always welcome but you being a > co-author of the draft, these comments I think should > have been provided sooner to your co-author or > included in the ongoing revision that the draft has > undergone.
Yes, my apologies, I've not been keeping up and got quite rushed and sloppy. And though I'm an author, I haven't been involved in the editing cycles for at least a year (after the my list of technical issues were resolved). What is the best way for me to proceed? Most of my items are really editorial. One other item has technical content, but I think the real issue is that an edit has not been fully applied. The most significant item is that I think the document would be clearer if a summary of behaviors related to the "retain option" was added. Of course, all of these should be decided by the current authors, but what is the proper process at this point? Dale _______________________________________________ BLISS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss
