Jonathan Morton <[email protected]> writes: > On 21 Mar, 2011, at 12:47 am, Dave Täht wrote: > >>> The interesting outlier thus far is 8... I'm tempted to stop the test >>> now and recompile for testing 3 u/l 3 d/l first.... >> >> Scenario 12: 2 uploads, 2 downloads... 4725 KiB/s up, 3645 KiB/s >> down, 0.81 Hz smoothness >> >> ... Still running tests ... > > I should probably explain what the scenarios are. > > Every combination of up/down flows is tried for each of 1, 2, 3, 4 > total flows. That's 14 scenarios covering basic downloading and > uploading through to heavy whole-family use. > > Then I jump ahead to 32 flows, with 32/0, 31/1, 16/16, 1/31, 0/32 > splits, to simulate BitTorrent style traffic. > > Total 19 scenarios.
I'll still argue that starting with the worst case scenarios and working down would be best... 3/3 perhaps Scenario 12: 2 uploads, 2 downloads... 4725 KiB/s up, 3645 KiB/s down, 0.81 Hz smoothness Scenario 13: 3 uploads, 1 downloads... 4917 KiB/s up, 3175 KiB/s down, 0.59 Hz smoothness > > - Jonathan > -- Dave Taht http://nex-6.taht.net _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
