On 06/05/2012 03:00 PM, Ingemar s Johansson wrote: > And thanks for an interesting report. I must say that this resembles LEDBAT > quite a lot, with the exception that LEDBAT is a (mainly) sender based > modification and may thus be easier to deploy. Like commented on this list > (by Jonathan Morton for instance) it could be interesting to see how they > compare. > One flaw with delay based algos (which LEDBAT tries to solve) is the > sensitivity to reverse path delay (similar issue with Vegas I believe), I > guess your algorithm can have the same problem or. Does not mean that LEDBAT > is free of problem... > > Regards > /Ingemar Johansson > > I wonder how the two schemes would interact, and if it would make sense for the sender to adjust the send window in a similar manner?
--dave -- David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest dav...@spamcop.net | -- Mark Twain (416) 223-8968 _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
