> > Perhaps you should push your system to OpenWRT? > There is still some work going on to streamline the gui.
Fair enough. That's important. > there are less features in the aqm-scripts for prioritizing packet > types than qos-scripts. I wouldn't bother much with that. The promise of fq_codel is that we can get rid of our prioritising hacks -- if we need that kind of features, then fq_codel has failed. > I just had to come up with a way to disable it at high (> 80 mbit) > rates on incoming traffic (not enough cpu in cerowrt), I wouldn't bother with that either. 120 Mbit/s is the highest rate you can get in Europe as far as I can tell, so being able to push 80 Mbit/s on a four year old router is fine (as long as you're careful to avoid shaping traffic between LAN and WLAN -- I certainly wouldn't want backing up my laptop to be capped at 80 Mbit/s). > so I'd like it to run faster, maybe using drr in that case, or > something like what free.fr uses... What are they using? > And there are actually two aqm/packet scheduling shapers in there (a > simple 1 tier and a 3 tier one), Remove the non-default features. Be a man, Dave, dump it all. > In the interim, existing openwrt users can add ceropackages-3.3 into > their feeds. They won't. If you want to have an effect on the world, you need to push it into the default OpenWRT scripts. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
