On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 12:24:03PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: > disagree with me, thinking that aqm + ecn alone is safe to deploy, and > obviously I promote fq_codel derived stuff on routers (and sch_fq on > well protected servers), far more than pie, although I am careful to > maintain that I can´t wait to see pie (without ecn) on cablemodems one > day RSN.
Can you elaborate on what you mean by “well protected”? I usually recommend sch_fq for end hosts pretty much uncritically, so if there's a snag, I'd love to hear about it. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
