I am delighted to see this functionality in netperf, however hacky. We could use to also do something tcp-like in udp, with timestamping like this (perhaps using the SO_TIMESTAMPING api in linux for increased accuracy on rx)...
Getting better tools, one patch at a time, one tool at a time, one daemon at a time... On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Bill Ver Steeg (versteb) <[email protected]> wrote: > Lars- > > Looking now - Thinking back, I probably hacked it in myself. I do not see it > on my road Linux laptop, so I will check on my servers when I am back in the > office. > > > > Bill Ver Steeg > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eggert, Lars [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 12:38 PM > To: Bill Ver Steeg (versteb) > Cc: bloat > Subject: Re: RRUL for netperf (bad hack) > > Hi, > > On 2015-4-17, at 18:18, Bill Ver Steeg (versteb) <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Iperf also has some one-way and two-way delay measurements (or at least the >> version I used last year did). It also put timestamps in the payload of the >> packets. > > got a pointer to that version of iperf? I only see some latency-related stuff > for UDP flows. > > Thanks, > Lars > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat -- Dave Täht Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67 _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
